Integration using residue theorem (part 2)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Residue Theorem to evaluate the integral $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{(x^2+4)^2}$$. Participants explore the necessity of choosing a contour that includes singularities and the implications of the contour's radius.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the radius R must be greater than 2 when setting up the contour for the integral.
  • Another participant clarifies that the assumption of R > 2 ensures that the singularity at $z = 2i$ is included within the contour C.
  • A follow-up question is raised about the necessity of including the singularity within the contour.
  • It is explained that as R approaches infinity, the contour must contain the singularity to evaluate the integral properly, and if R is less than 2, the contour would not include any singularities, making the limit process ineffective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the reasoning behind the choice of R > 2, but the discussion remains focused on clarifying the implications rather than reaching a consensus on a broader conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of contour integration in complex analysis and the conditions under which singularities must be considered, but does not resolve all potential nuances regarding the application of the Residue Theorem.

aruwin
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Hello.
I need some explanation here. I got the solution but I don't understand something.

Question:
Find the integral using Residue Theorem.

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{(x^2+4)^2}$$

Here is the first part of the solution that I don't understand:

To evaluate $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{(x^2+4)^2}$, consider $\oint_c\frac{dz}{(z^2 + 4)^2}$,
where C consists of the real axis [-R, R] with R > 2, and the upper half of Γ: |z| = R (all with counterclockwise orientation).

My question: Why is R>2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an assumption, not a result, that $R > 2$. This assumption was made so that the singularity of $f$ at $z = 2i$ lies inside C.
 
Euge said:
It's an assumption, not a result, that $R > 2$. This assumption was made so that the singularity of $f$ at $z = 2i$ lies inside C.

Ok, but why must the singularity lies inside C?
 
aruwin said:
Ok, but why must the singularity lies inside C?

At some point in the calculation, you're going to let $R \to \infty$ to find the value of $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{dx}{(x^2 + 4)^2}$. As $R$ increases without bound, $C$ will contain the singularity of $f$ at $z = 2i$. Knowing that, you choose $R$ large enough in the setup of the contour. Also, keep the following in mind. If $0 < R < 2$, the contour $C$ will contain no singularity of $f$, but you cannot take the limit as $R \to \infty$ as $R < 2$. Then integrating over $C$ will serve no purpose.
 
Euge said:
At some point in the calculation, you're going to let $R \to \infty$ to find the value of $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{dx}{(x^2 + 4)^2}$. As $R$ increases without bound, $C$ will contain the singularity of $f$ at $z = 2i$. Knowing that, you choose $R$ large enough in the setup of the contour. Also, keep the following in mind. If $0 < R < 2$, the contour $C$ will contain no singularity of $f$, but you cannot take the limit as $R \to \infty$ as $R < 2$. Then integrating over $C$ will serve no purpose.

Thank you for the explanation. I got it now :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K