Interatomic coulombic potential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypatio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating interatomic coulombic potentials using Coulomb's law. The standard equation is F = k_e(q₁q₂/r²), where k_e is typically 8.988 x 10⁹ N m²/C². A conflicting value of k_e = 2.31 x 10¹⁹ J·nm is mentioned, which is derived from a different unit system that uses energy instead of force. The potential energy formula E = k_e(q₁q₂/r) is clarified, highlighting the distinction between numerical charge and partial charge, with the elementary charge (e) valued at 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and its applications.
  • Familiarity with units of measurement in physics, particularly N m²/C² and J·nm.
  • Knowledge of elementary charge and its significance in atomic interactions.
  • Basic grasp of potential energy versus force in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of Coulomb's law in different unit systems.
  • Study the concept of partial charge and its relevance in molecular interactions.
  • Explore the differences between force and potential energy in electrostatics.
  • Learn about the significance of the elementary charge (e) in atomic and molecular physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, molecular chemistry, and computational modeling of atomic interactions.

Hypatio
Messages
147
Reaction score
1
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials. The equation given in wikipedia is

F=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}

where k_e is in units of N m^2 C^-2, q are the partial charges, and r is the distance.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*10^19 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r^2 give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*10^19 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Hypatio! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Hypatio said:
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*1019 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r2give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

the force is ~ 1/r2

the potential is ~ 1/r :wink:
Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*1019 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?

i don't recognise that figure

the usual constant in Coulomb's law is 8.988 x 109 N m2/C2

(or 8.987 551 787 368 176 4, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law#The_law)
 
Hypatio said:
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials. The equation given in wikipedia is

F=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}

where k_e is in units of N m^2 C^-2, q are the partial charges, and r is the distance.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*10^19 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r^2 give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*10^19 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?

The formula in the paper is for energy and not for force:
E=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r}
The numerical constant comes from the units: they use the numerical charge (number of electron charges) and not the charge in coulombs.
They also use the distance in nm.
So the number you see is

k_e\times e^2\times 10^9
 
Thanks!

What is the difference between the partial charge and the 'numerical charge'? Also, what is the parameter e?
 
Numerical charge is the charge in units of elementary (electron charge).
e is the value of the elementary charge (1.6x10^(-19) C).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
848
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
605
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
634
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K