What is the Mistake in My Electric Potential Problem Calculation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a calculation error in an electric potential problem involving two point charges, as outlined in OpenStax, Chapter 19. The first charge has a mass of 1000 kg and a charge of 50.0 µC, while the second charge has a mass of 1.00 kg and a charge of 10.0 µC, traveling at 10.0 m/s. The main mistakes identified include the incorrect application of voltage (V) as energy and failure to account for the kinetic energy of both charges at the time of closest approach, leading to implausible results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent unit usage and careful step-by-step calculations in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charges
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving voltage and distance
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of electric potential energy in the context of point charges
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in systems with multiple forces
  • Study the correct application of voltage equations in physics problems
  • Practice solving problems involving kinetic energy and potential energy conversions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric potential and energy conservation in electrostatics.

Henry Shi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble understanding this problem in Electric Potential. (Source: OpenStax, Chapter 19)
Now consider another system of two point charges. One has a mass of 1000 kg and a charge of 50.0 µC, and is initially stationary. The other has a mass of 1.00 kg, a charge of 10.0 µC, and is initially traveling directly at the first point charge at 10.0 m/s from very far away. What will be the closest approach of these two objects to each other?

Here is my attempt:
The internal energy of the system is conserved. Therefore, we have:
KE1+PE1=KE2+PE2
The potential energy at time 1 is essentially 0, and the kinetic energy at time 2 is 0. PE=qV. Therefore, the equation becomes:
0.5(1)(10)2 + 0 = 0 + (10*10-6)V
50=(10-5)V
5,000,000=V
This number is implausible. I also used V=kq1q2/R
5,000,000=kq1q2/R
5,000,000=(9*10-9)(10*10-6)(50*10-6) / R
Solving for R, I got R=9*10-9m

However, the correct answer was R=9*10-2 m, or 9 cm.

What did I do wrong?
 

Attachments

  • CNX_APPhysics_19_M1_PntChgB.jpg
    CNX_APPhysics_19_M1_PntChgB.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 576
Physics news on Phys.org
Henry Shi said:
and the kinetic energy at time 2 is 0
Both will move a bit at the time of closest approach, but that is a small correction, not the 7 orders of magnitude difference you got.
Henry Shi said:
This number is implausible.
Why?
Henry Shi said:
I also used V=kq1q2/R
You used V as voltage before. Now you use it as energy and set it equal. That doesn't work. If you would have worked with units, you would have spotted the problem immediately.
Henry Shi said:
Solving for R
There is another mistake in this step.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K