Interatomic potential LCAO using GGA

  • Thread starter starvis
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Potential
In summary: In experiment the potential was found by measuring the height of the spark between two electrodes. I am pretty sure the potential found in vasp and qespresso are same.
  • #1
starvis
5
0
Can someone tell me where possible cause of the problem ?

I am using home made code where LCAO (using LDA and GGA) implemented for calculation of electronic structure. Calculating structure for Cr (BCC) gives 1 Ang off the potential minimum (3.6 A should be 2.88 A). I checked k point mesh, primitive vectors, core charge (18), and atomic positions. If I calculate for SC I am getting the right potential minimum at 2.88.

Thank you so much for your help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have a self-made DFT code and you don't even know where to look for the problem?...
 
  • #3
Instead of asking this question I would prefer some help. If you are not able to
give reasonable suggestions please do not bother, learn and study more.
 
  • #4
In order to give some helpful suggestions you need to provide information about your problem. From your problem description it is impossible to see what you are doing, and thus also what you are doing wrong.

In particular, you did not provide information on some *very* obvious questions:
0. What kind of basis set/methods do you use? Plane waves? Plane waves + pseudopotentials? Projector augmented plane waves? Gaussians? Something else? How do you calculate the terms in your DFT (e.g. Coulomb, core repulsion, pseudo-potentials, functional)? Are you sure these terms work?

1. Can you calculate the correct energies/wave functions/lattice constants for simpler systems? E.g., does your calculation work for a H solid or jellium? (This would allow you to exclude problems with the core representation and various basis set issues)

2. Does your program work for Coulomb-only "DFT" (i.e., the zero functional).

3. Do you know what the GGA/LDA result is supposed to be for Cr solid? I.e., did you calculate it with the same functional with a working code, or is the value you expect an experimental number?

In your OP you effectively said: "I have a home made program and it does not do what I expect." What kind of answer do you expect to that?
 
  • #5
Thank you so much for your constructive reply:

0. I am using LCAO with Gaussian basis set solving KS equations in self consistent manner.

1. I have not calculated it yet, just finished Cr. The terms are calculated using functionals.

2.Have not check it yet, thank you so much I will check it.

3. I have checked the potential using vasp, qespresso and experiment. In vasp and qe i calculated using pseudopotentials.
 

1. What is interatomic potential LCAO?

Interatomic potential LCAO (Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals) is a method used in computational chemistry to describe the electronic structure of molecules. It involves combining atomic orbitals to form molecular orbitals, which represent the electronic states of the molecule.

2. What is GGA in relation to interatomic potential LCAO?

GGA (Generalized Gradient Approximation) is a type of exchange-correlation functional used in density functional theory (DFT) calculations. It is used in conjunction with interatomic potential LCAO to calculate the electronic properties of molecules.

3. How does interatomic potential LCAO using GGA differ from other methods?

Interatomic potential LCAO using GGA is a more accurate and efficient method compared to other approaches, such as Hartree-Fock theory. It takes into account the non-local exchange and correlation effects between electrons, which are important for accurate calculations of molecular properties.

4. What are some applications of interatomic potential LCAO using GGA?

Interatomic potential LCAO using GGA has a wide range of applications in materials science, chemistry, and physics. It is used to study the electronic structure and properties of molecules, solids, surfaces, and interfaces. It is also used in drug design, catalysis, and nanotechnology.

5. Are there any limitations to interatomic potential LCAO using GGA?

While interatomic potential LCAO using GGA is a powerful method, it does have some limitations. It is not suitable for systems with strong correlation effects, such as transition metal complexes, and it may not accurately describe dispersion forces. Additionally, it can be computationally demanding for larger systems.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
862
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
723
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top