Interesting but useless equation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eliudthorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a mathematical equation proposed by a user’s son, which claims to transpose positive integers using the formula \(\left(n\right)=\sum_{k=0}^{[log_b\left(n\right)]}\left(b^k\left(\left\lfloor \frac{n}{b^{\left\lceil log_b\left(n\right)\right\rceil}-k-1}\right\rfloor \%b \right)\right)\%\). The equation utilizes logarithmic functions and modulus operations, with 'b' representing the base of the number system, such as 10. The conversation also touches on formatting issues with LaTeX in the forum, which were later resolved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions, specifically \(\log_b\)
  • Familiarity with modulus operations in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of integer transposition concepts
  • Experience with LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of logarithms and their applications in number theory
  • Explore integer transposition techniques in mathematics
  • Learn about modulus operations and their significance in programming
  • Practice using LaTeX for mathematical documentation and presentations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in mathematics, and anyone interested in number theory and mathematical expressions.

eliudthorn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me what this is?

My son created it as an entertaining exercise -- he says it transposes positive integers. Is he right?

\left(n\right)=\sum_{k=0}^{[log_b\left(n\right)]}\left(b^k\left(\left\lfloor \frac{n}{b^{\left\lceil log_b\left(n\right)\right\rceil}-k-1}\right\rfloor \%b \right)\right)% represents modulus and b represents the base of the number being transposed (e.g., 10). Sorry if this is not the appropriate forum (Calculus & Analysis). Please attribute that to ignorance rather than to apathy.

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your latex isn't working.
 
Thank you mathman. I think the latex is fixed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
711
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
37K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
12K