Interesting Projectile Motion problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically analyzing the trajectory of a ball thrown from a height of 8 meters at a 45-degree angle, with the goal of landing it in a designated area 9 meters away from the base of the roof. The challenge is to determine the necessary initial velocity for the ball to achieve this target.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using component methods to break down the initial velocity into horizontal and vertical components. There are questions about the assumptions regarding the vertical displacement and the implications of the initial velocity on the height of the ball's trajectory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions made about the vertical displacement and initial velocity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equations of motion, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the final vertical displacement due to the unknown initial velocity, and participants are grappling with how to set up the problem correctly given the constraints of the scenario.

Mattowander
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A person throws a ball off a roof that is 8 meters high with an angle of 45 degrees from the positive x axis. The ball is supposed to land in the center of a square that is centered 9 meters away from the base of the roof. With which initial velocity must the person throw the ball so that it lands from it is supposed to?





Homework Equations



Vi = unknown
Vx = 9/Ttot
Vx = Vi cos (45)
Vy = Vi sin (45)
h = 9 meters
y = distance from the initial height of the ball to the height that the ball peaks.
Ttot = the total time the ball is in there air.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ttot = t1 + t2 where t1 = the time it takes the ball to peak and t2 = the time it takes the ball to fall from that maximum height.

t1 = -Vy/g
t2 = sqrt ( (2h + 2y)/g)

t3 = -Vy/g + sqrt ( (2h + 2y)/g) = 9/Vx

When replaced with everything I'm given, I get the following equation. Keep in mind we're trying to solve for Vi.

t3 = -Vi sin(45)/g + sqrt ( (2(8) + 2(-Vi sin (45)/2g)/g) = 9/(Vi cos (45) )

From here, I'm not sure how I can solve for Vi. Is this problem impossible to solve with what I'm given or am I just making it a lot harder than it needs to be? I'd appreciate any help ya'll can give me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd just use the component method.

This is what you end up with

Vx = Vocos([tex]\Theta[/tex])
Vy = Vosin([tex]\Theta[/tex])

Because the angle is 45o, what can you assume about the X and Y components of the velocity?

From that you can use the kinematics formulas to mess around with the stuff you have and find other information.

For instance:

d=Vot+(1/2)at2

You know what the final vertical displacement will be, and from this you can substitute and solve.

Or you could try using other kinematics equations.

Just remember that X only has one equation: Dx=Vxt
 
No you don't know what the final vertical displacement will be because you don't know the initial velocity.

Yes I know the velocity components of Vi are the same.

Did you look at the problem?
 
You said it needs to land in a square at ground level from a 8 METER high roof. So your displacement is -8.
 
No because if it was initial velocity UPWARD, the initial height will be greater than 8 meters. The additional height will be equal to Vy^2/2g.

Since I don't know Vy without knowing Vi, I don't have the complete vertical displacement.
 
I agree with Mattowander's initial assertion that he is making this harder than it needs to be. Setting up the x-y origin at the edge of the roof (implied by Lancelot), concentrate on solving the following equations at the specific time T when the projectile is at (X, Y) = (9, -8)

X = vxi * T [x component of motion]

Y = (vyi * T) -9.8 T^2 [y component of motion]

vxi = vyi
 
Sorry, forgot the 1/2
Y = (vyi * T) -(9.8 T^2)/2 [y component of motion]
 
Mattowander said:
No because if it was initial velocity UPWARD, the initial height will be greater than 8 meters. The additional height will be equal to Vy^2/2g.

Since I don't know Vy without knowing Vi, I don't have the complete vertical displacement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_%28vector%29" is the distance from A to B, not the distance you traveled in getting there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K