Interference in Thin Films, figuring out the phases

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the phases of light interference in thin films, specifically using the example of light incident on a thin layer of material with refractive indices n1=1.32, n2=1.75, and n3=1.39. The goal is to find the third least thickness (L) for maximum interference at a wavelength (λ) of 382 nm. The equation for maximum interference is established as 2L=(m+1/2)λ/n2, where the addition of λ/2 accounts for phase inversion upon reflection. The necessity of using the term 2m+1 arises from the requirement for odd multiples to achieve maximum interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin film interference principles
  • Familiarity with refractive indices and their implications
  • Knowledge of wave propagation and phase relationships
  • Basic proficiency in solving equations related to optical phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the thin film interference equations
  • Explore the impact of varying refractive indices on interference patterns
  • Learn about phase shifts upon reflection in different media
  • Investigate applications of thin film interference in optical coatings
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the principles of light interference and its applications in technology.

emmy
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I don't have a question on a specific problem, I am more caught up in the determination of the phases- I'll give a general problem to use as an example:

In Fig. 35-41, light is incident perpendicularly on a thin layer of material 2 that lies between (thicker) materials 1 and 3. The waves of rays r1 and r2 interfere, and here we consider the type of interference to be either maximum (max) or minimum (min). We are given:

n1=1.32
n2=1.75
n3=1.39
we want to find a max
for the 3rd least thickness of L (in nm)
λ=382nm (in air)

Figure:
nt0043-y.gif


rays are tilted for clarity

Homework Equations


Since we want a maximum, the general equation for a maximum would be:
2L=(m+1/2)λ/n2


The Attempt at a Solution



in the case of this problem, we add an additional λ/2 for the incidence of r1 on n2.
so my real question is this-

why is it that you multiply m by 2 to end up with 2m+1 in this case? when do you just use (m+1)λ vs (2m+1/2)λ


I've been reading and researching for hours now, so any help would truly be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
High-speed to slow speed you get a phase inversion.
http://www.kettering.edu/physics/drussell/Demos/reflect/reflect.html
... it has neat animations of the effect for string, you have to scroll down for the general.

That 2m+1 gives you an odd number - do you see why an odd number is needed?

The trick is to try drawing a wave as it propagates through the film. What happens if it's an even number?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
910
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K