I don't have a question on a specific problem, I am more caught up in the determination of the phases- I'll give a general problem to use as an example:
In Fig. 35-41, light is incident perpendicularly on a thin layer of material 2 that lies between (thicker) materials 1 and 3. The waves of rays r1 and r2 interfere, and here we consider the type of interference to be either maximum (max) or minimum (min). We are given:
we want to find a max
for the 3rd least thickness of L (in nm)
λ=382nm (in air)
rays are tilted for clarity
Since we want a maximum, the general equation for a maximum would be:
The Attempt at a Solution
in the case of this problem, we add an additional λ/2 for the incidence of r1 on n2.
so my real question is this-
why is it that you multiply m by 2 to end up with 2m+1 in this case? when do you just use (m+1)λ vs (2m+1/2)λ
I've been reading and researching for hours now, so any help would truly be appreciated.