Internal (gauge) symmetries and spacetime symmetries

  • #51
tom.stoer said:
I do not want to identify specific loopholes for a given framework (quantum field theory on spacetime, operators, S-matrix, ...) but I want to question the framework itself!
Hey, didn't know you were so radical.:-p
tom.stoer said:
Formulating theories for emergent or discrete spacetime like (colored) spin networks may render the concept for "S-matrix on spacetime" meaningless. The question then is whether you can still use this S-matrix approach which is restrcited to a certain regime to derive a no-go theorem for the whole theory. I doubt that this will work and therefore I expect that many of these no-go theorems will cease to exist when identifying a fundamental theory of quantum gravity. Besides the Coleman-Mandula theorem the Weinberg–Witten theorem is another candidate to fail.

I share this view about no-go theorems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
TrickyDicky said:
Hey, didn't know you were so radical.:-p
depends on the enemy ...
 
  • #53
tom.stoer said:
I doubt that this will work and therefore I expect that many of these no-go theorems will cease to exist when identifying a fundamental theory of quantum gravity.

Now I have a question bearing some level of radicalness :)

Is there an empirical reason to be led to believe that gravity is (or should be) quantized? Or is it principally a consistency in frameworks that one assumes should be accommodated?
 
  • #54
PhilDSP said:
Now I have a question bearing some level of radicalness :)

Is there an empirical reason to be led to believe that gravity is (or should be) quantized? Or is it principally a consistency in frameworks that one assumes should be accommodated?

I remember having read somewhere a physicist that claimed that gravity was already "quantized" in GR. I will try to find the reference because I can't remember what kind of arguments he used or what he meant.
 
  • #55
PhilDSP said:
Is there an empirical reason to be led to believe that gravity is (or should be) quantized? Or is it principally a consistency in frameworks that one assumes should be accommodated?
There is no direct experimental evidence for quantum gravity, so I would say that the indications are mostly due to theoretical and consistency reasons; but there are a lot ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top