Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasmiros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Lab
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the interpretation and analysis of air HEPA filter results for a school project, specifically regarding the presence of elements like Aluminum (Al) and Bromine (Br). Participants express uncertainty about the standards for these elements and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help interpreting HEPA filter results but lacks knowledge of the relevant standards for certain elements.
  • Another participant criticizes the source of the document linked by the original poster, labeling it as a "crackpot conspiracy website" related to chemtrails.
  • Some participants defend the original poster's request, questioning the dismissal of the document based on its association with chemtrails.
  • There is a contention over the validity of using Wikipedia as a reference, with participants expressing differing opinions on its reliability.
  • One participant emphasizes the forum's stance against discussing conspiracy theories, specifically the chemtrail theory, which is not accepted by the scientific community.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the validity of the original document and the relevance of chemtrails to the discussion. The conversation remains unresolved with ongoing debate about the sources and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the standards for the elements in question and the reliance on potentially controversial sources that may not be scientifically accepted.

kasmiros
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need some interpretation/analysis of the air HEPA filter results for my school project. I don't know exactly what are the standars of those elements(Al,Br etc.) so I can't say if they are below range or above range. Please, if someone can help me I'd be very grateful.
Here is the document: Edit: removed link to crackpot siteAnd sorry for my english, hope you understand everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
That website is a crackpot conspiracy website. Is this some supposed analysis of a "chemtrail"?
 
And what's wrong with it ? It's a document linked with a chemtrails
 
kasmiros said:
And what's wrong with it ? It's a document linked with a chemtrails
Chemtrails are conspiracy theory and against the rules of this forum. Contrails are the wator vapor trails left by aircraft at high altitudes.

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some trails left by aircraft are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in clandestine programs directed by government officials.[1] This theory is not accepted by the scientific community, which states that they are just normal contrails, and that there is no scientific evidence supporting the chemtrail theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory#Contrails_vs_chemtrails
 
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?
Then ok, if you don't want to work with materials that are linked with policy etc. maybe just look at this like on a normal document ?
 
kasmiros said:
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?

You are linking to a random web document, but you are criticizing use of a wikipedia link?
 
kasmiros said:
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?
Then ok, if you don't want to work with materials that are linked with policy etc. maybe just look at this like on a normal document ?
I wanted to post something you might understand.

Sorry, but we don't allow crackpot conspiracy theories and chemtrails are crackpot conspiracy theories.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K