MHB Interpretation of estimated coefficients

Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/402/question2s.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/402/question2s.jpg

Is this a linear model?

If so you expect the coefficient for the distance term be negative, other things being equal you expect the trade between the countries to decline with increasing distance. The coefficient is the rate at which trade varies with distance.

CB
 
Oh yeah sorry I forgot to add (yes it is a linear model), but attached is the regression output from Eviews 7:

My main concern is whether my wording for the interpretation is correct or not because my teacher told me to be very pedantic when giving an interpretation and rather than saying "all else constant" I have to list out all the other variables.

Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • kkk.JPG
    kkk.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 79
Usagi said:
Oh yeah sorry I forgot to add (yes it is a linear model), but attached is the regression output from Eviews 7:

My main concern is whether my wording for the interpretation is correct or not because my teacher told me to be very pedantic when giving an interpretation and rather than saying "all else constant" I have to list out all the other variables.

Thanks :)

Too much pedantry is the enemy of understanding.

It is the partial derivative of the trade flow with respect to distance.

CB
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top