Undergrad Interpretation of probability density in QFT

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of probability density in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), specifically regarding the Klein-Gordon equation. It is clarified that the quantity |φ(x)|² cannot be interpreted as a probability density in the conventional sense, and a better framework is non-relativistic QFT, where the distinction between the field operator and the wave function is crucial. The field operator creates a particle state at a specific position, while the wave function's squared modulus represents the probability density. The conversation also highlights the confusion surrounding the simultaneous interpretations of localization and probability spread. Further reading is suggested to deepen understanding of these concepts in QFT.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am a bit confused about the interpretation of probability density in QFT. Let's say we have the Klein-Gordon equation. I understand that this is the field equation for a spin-0 charged particle. So if we find a solution ##\phi(x)## of the Klein-Gordon equation, as far as I understand this can be interpreted as a probability density (i.e. where can you find the particle with a given probability, given by ##\| \phi(x)^2 \|dx##), but at the same time it can be interpreted as a creation operator so when you apply ##\phi(x)## on the vacuum state ##\|0>##, you create a particle at the position x (please let me know if I said something wrong up to know - I might have understood something wrong). As a first question, do these 2 interpretation hold only for a free particle, or even for Klein-Gordon equation with an interaction term? And I am a bit confused about how do these 2 interpretation can take place at the same time and when do you pick one over the other. The first one assume that the position of the particle is spread in space with different probabilities at each point while the second one assumes that the particle is localized at the point where it is created, but in the end, mathematically, you have a single solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. So, can someone explain to me more in depth the meaning of these 2 interpretations and the differences between them? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, Klein-Gordon equation is not a good example because ##|\phi(x)|^2## cannot be interpreted as a probability density in the usual sense. To make a better sense of your question, it is better to consider non-relativistic QFT, i.e. second-quantized Schrödinger equation.

Second, within non-relativistic QFT, one should distinguish field operator ##\hat{\phi}(x)## from the wave function ##\psi(x)##. The object ##\hat{\phi}(x)|0\rangle## is a 1-particle state at position ##x##. The quantity ##|\psi(x)|^2## is the probability density. For the relation between ##\hat{\phi}(x)## and ##\psi(x)##, and for other details, see
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163
Secs. 7 and 8.
 
Demystifier said:
First, Klein-Gordon equation is not a good example because ##|\phi(x)|^2## cannot be interpreted as a probability density in the usual sense. To make a better sense of your question, it is better to consider non-relativistic QFT, i.e. second-quantized Schrödinger equation.

Second, within non-relativistic QFT, one should distinguish field operator ##\hat{\phi}(x)## from the wave function ##\psi(x)##. The object ##\hat{\phi}(x)|0\rangle## is a 1-particle state at position ##x##. The quantity ##|\psi(x)|^2## is the probability density. For the relation between ##\hat{\phi}(x)## and ##\psi(x)##, and for other details, see
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163
Secs. 7 and 8.
Hello! Thank you so so much for this paper. It really helped me a lot and also got me to understand the second quantization. If you know any other paper at this level, to prepare me for QFT it would be great!
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Based on the thermal interpretation, I developed a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to propose a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. The proposed theory operates fully within the established mathematical formalism of quantum field theory. The proposed theory unifies the classical and quantum intuition about the macroscopic and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 309 ·
11
Replies
309
Views
16K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
548
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
10K