Interpretations of Quantum for a Graduate Student

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the various interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on Aharonov's Time-Symmetric theories and Relational interpretations, as well as their validity within quantum field theory (QFT). Participants express a desire for mathematical insights rather than qualitative descriptions, while also debating the relevance of philosophical interpretations in the context of QFT.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that different philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics are merely different ways of discussing the same physics, with equivalent physical predictions.
  • Others argue that interpretations can be relevant and that some formulations, such as the path integral, are crucial for understanding QFT.
  • A participant mentions several alternative formulations of quantum mechanics, including De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, dynamical collapse models, Many-Worlds interpretations, and stochastic field theory.
  • Specific references to literature and review articles are provided for further exploration of these interpretations, particularly in relation to QFT.
  • There is a contention regarding the value of studying alternative interpretations versus focusing on new physics, with some participants emphasizing the importance of exploring new models.
  • Concerns are raised about assumptions regarding the OP's background and interests, suggesting that the OP may not necessarily be focused solely on particle theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics in the context of QFT. There is no consensus on whether studying alternative interpretations is a worthwhile endeavor compared to focusing on new physics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of assuming the OP's background or interests, indicating that the discussion may not fully account for the diversity of fields within theoretical physics.

  • #31
It does not make the collaps superfluous, but the collapses appear only in the representation of the system (volume) on the surface, not in the system itself.

As I already said: I do not know whether research along these lines has already been done.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
tom.stoer said:
It does not make the collaps superfluous, but the collapses appear only in the representation of the system (volume) on the surface, not in the system itself.

As I already said: I do not know whether research along these lines has already been done.

Could you please give a meaning to the term ''boundary Hilbert space'' in the context of some simple quantum measurement, so that I can understand what you are talking about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 339 ·
12
Replies
339
Views
18K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
24K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
8K
  • · Replies 826 ·
28
Replies
826
Views
90K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 106 ·
4
Replies
106
Views
15K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
13K