Interspecies mating and animal classification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Coyotes (Canis latrans) and dogs (Canis lupus) can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, challenging traditional species classification that suggests different species cannot breed successfully. This phenomenon highlights the complexities of species definitions, particularly within the genus Canis, where hybridization is common. Additionally, environmental changes are facilitating cross-species coupling, as seen in Arctic mammals like grolar bears, which are hybrids of polar bears and grizzly bears. The ongoing re-evaluation of species classifications reflects the evolving understanding of genetics and interspecies relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of species classification and definitions
  • Basic knowledge of genetics and hybridization
  • Familiarity with the genus Canis and its species
  • Awareness of environmental impacts on species interaction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the genetic implications of hybridization in Canis species
  • Explore the concept of the "species problem" in biology
  • Investigate the effects of climate change on species interbreeding
  • Study the phenomenon of hybridization in Arctic mammals
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, ecologists, geneticists, and anyone interested in species classification and the effects of environmental changes on animal interbreeding.

leroyjenkens
Messages
616
Reaction score
49
I just read about how coyotes and dogs can interbreed, and their offspring can also breed. I thought one of the classifications of species was that two different species could either not breed together, or their offspring would be infertile. Dogs are of the species canis lupus, and coyotes are of the species canis latrans; different species, yet they're able to create fertile offspring. So was I misinformed about the distinction between different species? Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
They both belong to the species or genus Canis, the lupus/latrans are specific names. But I must say I'm not a true biologist, I never studied this subject. That being said, within Canis there are some examples of classes that cannot interbreed, it depends on the chromosomal architecture.
 
leroyjenkens said:
I just read about how coyotes and dogs can interbreed, and their offspring can also breed. I thought one of the classifications of species was that two different species could either not breed together, or their offspring would be infertile. Dogs are of the species canis lupus, and coyotes are of the species canis latrans; different species, yet they're able to create fertile offspring. So was I misinformed about the distinction between different species? Thanks.

Here, let me google that for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_problem

Just as Pluto was recently demoted, I'm sure "species" will one day be redefined, and ixnay this current problem.

-------------------
Ha ha! Pluto...
Sometimes, humour, just happens. :smile:
 
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) has driven geneticists nuts for years.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907199/

Is one study that shows what is now termed a subgenome exists for varying populations and individuals within a population of switchgrass. Meaning they interbreed. And you can have extant populations that are a polyploid mishmash.

The problem is that these plants appear to be one species, but genetically they are a biologists nightmare (or challenge). Just because choromsome numbers vary does not mean members of a population are not really a single species in the sense the OP posted. At least for some plants.

IMO this means that what we use to define a species is not a perfect match for what sometimes happens.

Plus the a lot of species in genus Canis appear to play the "switchgrass game": hybrids are fertile

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canid_hybrid

Also note: domestic dogs are new, circa 33000 years max, and are considered subsepecies of Canis lupus, the gray wolf. They have not been on "their own" genetically all that long and have not evolved isolation - probably because of human intervention.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog

This whole area is "fuzzy" enough to say - "it is still an arf-ful mess". (sorry)
 
Environmental Change forces Cross-species coupling

http://www.onearth.org/article/grolar-bears-and-narlugas-rise-of-the-arctic-hybrids

In 2006 an American hunter shot an animal in the far north of Canada’s Northwest Territories that shared characteristics of a polar bear and a grizzly. Earlier this year, a similar bear was killed less than 200 miles away, and DNA tests confirmed it was a mixture of the two species. The "grolar bear" thus joined a growing list of cross-species couplings -- beluga whales and narwhals, right whales and bowhead whales, various seal mixtures -- all confirmed to varying degrees by scientists in the Arctic over the past two decades.
...
In their Nature article, Kelly, Whiteley, and Tallmon list 34 potential hybridizations between discrete populations, species, and genera of marine mammals in the Arctic and near-Arctic.
...
What’s different about the Arctic is that melting ice is erasing a continent-size geographic barrier between isolated species. That kind of thing usually happens gradually, over geologic time; now it’s happening over a matter of decades.

The following link is to list of Arctic Mammals with the potential for hybridization
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v468/n7326/extref/468891a-s1.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
7K