Intuition for imaginary part of Fourier Transformation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the imaginary components in the Fourier transform of functions, specifically using the example of Sin[t]. The Fourier transform yields results with imaginary parts, such as I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[-1 + \[Omega]] - I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[1 + \[Omega]]. Participants explain that these imaginary components arise from the use of Euler's formula, which simplifies the algebra by combining sine and cosine terms into complex exponentials. The symmetry of positive and negative frequencies ensures that the superposition of these waves reconstructs a real signal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform principles
  • Familiarity with Euler's formula
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Ability to graph functions and interpret real and imaginary components
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of complex exponentials in signal processing
  • Learn about the implications of positive and negative frequencies in Fourier analysis
  • Study the graphical representation of Fourier transforms, focusing on magnitude and phase
  • Investigate applications of Fourier transforms in real-world signal processing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering fields, particularly those interested in signal processing and Fourier analysis.

159753x
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm having trouble understanding the Fourier transform of a function where the result in the frequency domain has imaginary components.

For example, if you take the Fourier transform of Sin[t] , the result is
Code:
I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[-1 + \[Omega]] - 
 I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[1 + \[Omega]]

What does this mean? I can't really graph it, so I am having trouble understanding it.

I can grasp a regular Fourier transform; it simply tells you what components are making up your signal wave. But when an imaginary I is thrown in there, what happens? How can the superposition of all those waves give you the real signal wave?

Does anybody have an intuition they could share?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have a certain (real) signal which you can represent as a sum of sines and cosines. Using Euler's formula, you can combine each pair of cosine and sine terms into an eix term. Instead of two real coefficients, now you will have a real and imaginary part. One reason to do it this way is that it actually makes the algebra easier!

To inspect the Fourier transform, you can just graph the real and imaginary parts separately (just as you would have graphed the sine and cosine coefficients separately) or you can graph the magnitude and phase separately.

The superposition of waves will give you back a real signal because there are both "positive" and "negative" frequencies, and they have a certain symmetry: if A(x) is the coefficient at frequency x, then A(x) = conj(A(-x)), i.e., if A(x) = a + ib then A(-x) = a - ib.

Check out what you get when you try to put the signal back together, remembering also that cos(x) = cos(-x) and -sin(x) = sin(-x):

(a + bi) * eix + (a - bi) * e-ix = (a + bi) * (cos x + i sin x) + (a - bi) * (cos x - i sin x) = …
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Wow, that was a terrific explanation. You should consider becoming a teacher!

I believe I have a better understanding now, thanks friend!
 
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K