Intuition for imaginary part of Fourier Transformation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the imaginary components of the Fourier transform, particularly in the context of real signals like Sin[t]. Participants explore the implications of these imaginary parts and seek intuitive explanations for their presence in the frequency domain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the meaning of imaginary components in the Fourier transform of a real function, specifically Sin[t], and questions how these components contribute to reconstructing the original signal.
  • Another participant explains that using Euler's formula allows for combining sine and cosine terms into complex exponentials, which simplifies algebraic manipulation. They note that the real and imaginary parts can be graphed separately.
  • This participant also discusses the symmetry of positive and negative frequencies, suggesting that the imaginary components do not prevent the reconstruction of a real signal due to this symmetry.
  • A later reply appreciates the explanation provided, indicating a positive reception of the clarification offered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the utility of using complex numbers in the Fourier transform, but the initial confusion about the interpretation of imaginary components remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the deeper implications of the imaginary components in terms of physical interpretation or graphical representation, leaving some assumptions about the nature of these components unexamined.

159753x
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm having trouble understanding the Fourier transform of a function where the result in the frequency domain has imaginary components.

For example, if you take the Fourier transform of Sin[t] , the result is
Code:
I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[-1 + \[Omega]] - 
 I Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[1 + \[Omega]]

What does this mean? I can't really graph it, so I am having trouble understanding it.

I can grasp a regular Fourier transform; it simply tells you what components are making up your signal wave. But when an imaginary I is thrown in there, what happens? How can the superposition of all those waves give you the real signal wave?

Does anybody have an intuition they could share?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have a certain (real) signal which you can represent as a sum of sines and cosines. Using Euler's formula, you can combine each pair of cosine and sine terms into an eix term. Instead of two real coefficients, now you will have a real and imaginary part. One reason to do it this way is that it actually makes the algebra easier!

To inspect the Fourier transform, you can just graph the real and imaginary parts separately (just as you would have graphed the sine and cosine coefficients separately) or you can graph the magnitude and phase separately.

The superposition of waves will give you back a real signal because there are both "positive" and "negative" frequencies, and they have a certain symmetry: if A(x) is the coefficient at frequency x, then A(x) = conj(A(-x)), i.e., if A(x) = a + ib then A(-x) = a - ib.

Check out what you get when you try to put the signal back together, remembering also that cos(x) = cos(-x) and -sin(x) = sin(-x):

(a + bi) * eix + (a - bi) * e-ix = (a + bi) * (cos x + i sin x) + (a - bi) * (cos x - i sin x) = …
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Wow, that was a terrific explanation. You should consider becoming a teacher!

I believe I have a better understanding now, thanks friend!
 
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K