Invariance of a volume element in phase space, What does it mean?

Maumas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have been reading the third edition of Classical Mechanics by Goldstein, in particular, chapter 9 Poisson Brackets and Other canonical invariants. And it is shown that the magnitude of a volume element is invariant. I can understand what it means mathematically, but what physical implications does it have?

I have been reading similar questions and noticed that this invariance is related to Liouville’s Theorem. But I do not understand the underlying physics.

Maybe someone can shed light on this issue
Relevant Equations
.
The invariance of this volume element is shown by writing the infinitesimal volume elements $$d\eta$$ and $$d\rho$$

$$d\eta=dq_1.....dq_ndp_1......dp_n$$

$$d\rho=dQ_1.......dQ_ndP_1....dP_n$$

and we know that both of them are related to each other by the absolute value of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. So I do understand that if we have a canonical transformation $$d\eta=|M|d\rho$$ is $$d\eta=d\rho$$ but i do not know what it means physically.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maumas said:
but what physical implications does it have?
A phase flow of a Hamiltonian system consists of canonical transformations. Now see the Poincare recurrence theorem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top