Invariance of a volume element in phase space, What does it mean?

Click For Summary
The invariance of the volume element in phase space is demonstrated through the relationship between infinitesimal volume elements, expressed as dη and dρ, which are connected by the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. In canonical transformations, the equation dη = |M|dρ indicates that the volume elements remain invariant under these transformations. The physical implications of this invariance relate to the conservation of phase space volume in Hamiltonian systems, which is crucial for understanding dynamics. Additionally, this concept ties into the Poincaré recurrence theorem, suggesting that systems will return to a state close to their initial conditions over time. The discussion highlights the fundamental nature of volume preservation in the context of classical mechanics.
Maumas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have been reading the third edition of Classical Mechanics by Goldstein, in particular, chapter 9 Poisson Brackets and Other canonical invariants. And it is shown that the magnitude of a volume element is invariant. I can understand what it means mathematically, but what physical implications does it have?

I have been reading similar questions and noticed that this invariance is related to Liouville’s Theorem. But I do not understand the underlying physics.

Maybe someone can shed light on this issue
Relevant Equations
.
The invariance of this volume element is shown by writing the infinitesimal volume elements $$d\eta$$ and $$d\rho$$

$$d\eta=dq_1.....dq_ndp_1......dp_n$$

$$d\rho=dQ_1.......dQ_ndP_1....dP_n$$

and we know that both of them are related to each other by the absolute value of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. So I do understand that if we have a canonical transformation $$d\eta=|M|d\rho$$ is $$d\eta=d\rho$$ but i do not know what it means physically.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maumas said:
but what physical implications does it have?
A phase flow of a Hamiltonian system consists of canonical transformations. Now see the Poincare recurrence theorem.
 
So is there some elegant way to do this or am I just supposed to follow my nose and sub the Taylor expansions for terms in the two boost matrices under the assumption ##v,w\ll 1##, then do three ugly matrix multiplications and get some horrifying kludge for ##R## and show that the product of ##R## and its transpose is the identity matrix with det(R)=1? Without loss of generality I made ##\mathbf{v}## point along the x-axis and since ##\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{w} = 0## I set ##w_1 = 0## to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
671
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K