Invariant of a helicoid, like an electron but not quite.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Invariant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the geometrical properties of a helicoid, particularly focusing on a proposed invariant related to the "change in phase" for loops around the helicoid's axis. Participants explore the analogy between helicoids and electrons, examining the implications of rotational invariance and the nature of phase in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant posits that the "change in Phase" for a loop around the helicoid's axis is 2*pi, regardless of the angle of the helicoid's axis with respect to an intersecting plane.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of a loop lying entirely within the plane while encircling the helicoid's axis, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the geometry involved.
  • A later reply clarifies that the loop does indeed lie in the plane and encircles the helicoid's axis, proposing a method to define phase for points not on the helicoid's surface.
  • Another participant challenges the significance of invariance under 360-degree rotation, contrasting it with the behavior of an electron's state vector, which is invariant under a 720-degree rotation due to its half-spin nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the phase change and the implications of rotational invariance, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the geometry of helicoids and the definition of phase, which may not be universally agreed upon. The relationship between the helicoid and electron properties is also presented as speculative.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
Invariant of a helicoid, like an electron but not quite.


Consider the surface of a helicoid whose axis extends to infinity, see for example:

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=helicoid&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2

This surface has an interesting geometrical invariant. Consider a helicoid whose axis intersects an infinite plane. Let a perpendicular to this plane be arbitrarily labeled up. Consider the "change in phase" for a loop that lies in the plane and that goes once around the axis of the helicoid. I posit the "change in Phase" is 2*pi regardless of the angle the axis of the helicoid makes with respect to the plane? I have not defined the "phase" of a helicoid, let me try to do that now. In cylindrical coordinates (of proper orientation) the surface of a helicoid is :

z = phi

If we add 2*pi to phi we have in effect rotated the helicoid by an angle of 2*pi. The surface is invariant to rotation by any multiple of 2*pi. Because of this I suspect the above is true, namely:

"the "change in Phase" is 2*pi regardless of the angle the axis of the helicoid makes with respect to the plane?"

So in one way a helicoid is like an electron but not quite. Can you modify this picture to make the analogy with an electron more exact?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the "change in phase" for a loop that lies in the plane and that goes once around the axis of the helicoid
Unless I'm misunderstanding you (which is quite possible!), isn't it impossible for such a loop of the helicoid to actually lie within the plane?
 
muppet said:
Unless I'm misunderstanding you (which is quite possible!), isn't it impossible for such a loop of the helicoid to actually lie within the plane?

Yes. The loop both lies in the plane that the axis of the helicoid intersects and encircles the axis of the helicoid. All points not on the surface of the helicoid can be given a phase greater then 0 and less then 2*pi in a well defined way, namely by what angle must the helicoid be rotated about its axis so the surface coincides with the point in question.

Thanks for your input.
 
What's so remarkable about being invariant under rotation by 360 degrees?

I know quite a few things that are.. like most 3d objects. But the state vector of an electron, being a half-spin particle, isn't one of them. That'd be invariant under a 720 degree rotation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K