I am steadily working my way through D'Inverno and have reached Chapter 20. On page 272 there is a problem which goes along the lines of ... here is a Lagrangian ... show that the Einstein tensor can be derived from it. The Lagrangian in question is a 'quadratic' Lagrangian and has four terms along the lines of h(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); ^{ab}_{,b}h^{c}_{c,a}, ie four products of h with a variety of subscripts and superscript.

So my question is - where the hell does that come from? What is the physical significance of the terms? Is this a case of someone working backwards from the Einstein tensor to produce the equivalent Lagrangian?

Earlier in the book there was a problem relating to the Eddington Lagrangian, again the question is - What motivates the construction of these objects?

Can anyone shed some light?

TerryW

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inventing Lagrangians (D'Inverno)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Inventing Lagrangians D'Inverno | Date |
---|---|

I How to sum the first term in the Maxwell field Lagrangian | Feb 14, 2018 |

A Lagrangian of Geodesics | Aug 28, 2017 |

I Two Conserved Quantities Along Geodesic | Jul 25, 2017 |

A How to derive equations of motion in GR? | Jul 4, 2017 |

"Special" and "General" relativity- Who invented those terms? | May 12, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**