Inverse composite proof (wording of the proof)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the inverses of composite functions, specifically showing that if f:A->B and g:B->C are invertible mappings, then (g o f)^-1 = f^-1 o g^-1. Participants are focused on the wording and structure of the proof rather than the proof itself.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to articulate the proof, questioning the definitions and relationships between elements a, b, and c in the context of the mappings. There is a focus on establishing the uniqueness of elements and the implications of the mappings being invertible.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarity on specific statements and how to connect the definitions of the mappings to the proof structure. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to demonstrate the equality of the left and right sides of the equation for arbitrary elements.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that f and g are bijective, which is crucial for the existence of unique elements in sets A, B, and C. There is an emphasis on the arbitrary nature of the element c in C and its implications for the proof.

psycho2499
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f:A->B and g:B->C be invertible mappings. Show (g o f)^-1 = f^-1 o g^-1.


Homework Equations


A mapping is invertible iff it is bijective


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand why these are equivalent statements; however, I can't figure out the wording of the proof.

The best I can think of is:

Suppose f and g are invertible mappings defined f:A->B and g:B->C. Let a, b, and c be elements of sets A, B, and C respectively such that f(a)=b and g(b)=c. Since f and g are bijective, f^-1(b)=a and g^-1(c)=b. So (g o f)^-1(c) = a = f^-1(g^-1(c)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(g o f)^-1(c) = a

You haven't actually proven this to be the case.We want to show for all c\in C that (g\circ f)^{-1}(c) = f^{-1}(g^{-1}(c)). Let b\in B be the unique element of B such that g^{-1}(c)=b and a\in A the unique element of A such that f^{-1}(b) = a. These both exist because f and g are invertible.

Clearly f^{-1}(g^{-1}(c)) = a just by how a and b were defined. Since c is arbitrary, it suffices to prove that (g\circ f)^{-1}(c) = a as well. How can you do that?
 
"Since c is arbitrary, it suffices to prove that (g∘f)−1(c)=a as well. How can you do that?"

I don't quiet understand your question, or the statement before it.
 
what other statement involving a and c can you use, here?

where did a and c come from?

can we get c from a, somehow using f and g? how?

our assumptions have been as follows:

g-1:c-->b

f-1:b-->a

what is f(a)?
what is g(b)?
 
psycho2499 said:
"Since c is arbitrary, it suffices to prove that (g∘f)−1(c)=a as well. How can you do that?"

I don't quiet understand your question, or the statement before it.


To prove that two functions a(x) and b(x) are equal, you can prove that given any possible input x0, a(x0)=b(x0) (this shouldn't be particularly surprising) So to prove that (g\circ f)^{-1} = f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}, you can prove that given any c\in C, (g\circ f)^{-1}(c) = f^{-1}(g^{-1}(c)). We know that the right hand side of this last equation is a by how we defined b and a in my post... how can you prove that the left hand side is equal to a as well?
 
This is the part that confuses me. Should I be saying something to the effect:
For any a\inA there exists a unique b\inB and a unique c\inC such that f(a)=b and g(b)=c. It follows that g(f(a))=c. Thus (g o f)^(-1)(c)=a
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K