Inverse Fourier transform of ## \frac{1}{a+jw} ##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the inverse Fourier transform of the function ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, derived from the original function ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t)##, where ##h(t)## is the Heaviside function and ##a>0##. Participants emphasize the necessity of contour integration in the complex plane to evaluate the integral, suggesting that the residue theorem is a key technique for solving this problem. The correct notation for the Fourier transform is highlighted, with a preference for using the Greek letter omega (##\omega##) instead of ##w##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the Heaviside function and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of complex analysis, particularly contour integration
  • Experience with the residue theorem for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study contour integration techniques in complex analysis
  • Learn how to apply the residue theorem for evaluating integrals
  • Explore examples of inverse Fourier transforms involving rational functions
  • Review the properties and applications of the Heaviside function in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with Fourier transforms, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of inverse transforms and complex analysis techniques.

etf
Messages
179
Reaction score
2
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
Inverse Fourier transform is defined as
$$f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(jw)e^{jwt}dw.$$

Let ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t),a>0##, where ##h(t)## is heaviside function and ##a## is real constant.

Fourier transform of this function is
$$F(jw)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-at}e^{-jwt}dt=\frac{1}{a+jw}$$
How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##?
Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etf said:
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
Inverse Fourier transform is defined as
$$f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(jw)e^{jwt}dw.$$

Let ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t),a>0##, where ##h(t)## is heaviside function and ##a## is real constant.

Fourier transform of this function is
$$F(jw)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-at}e^{-jwt}dt=\frac{1}{a+jw}$$
How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##?
Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.

What is the reason you want to calculate the inverse FT of your ##F(\omega)##? [BTW: it should be called ##F(\omega)##, not ##F(i \omega)## or ##F(j \omega)##.] You already know how you obtained ##F## from your original function ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t)##. Are you just trying to practice, to see if you can do the integral and get back your ##f(t)##, or are you fundamentally misunderstanding something about about the subject?
 
Last edited:
etf said:
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
It's traditional to use the Greek letter omega, ##\omega##, not ##w##. (I hope you don't say "double-u" when you're talking to others, especially your instructor.)

How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##? Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
It's straightforward to calculate that integral if you know how to do contour integration in the complex plane. I'm guessing you probably haven't seen that yet.
 
Ray Vickson said:
What is the reason you want to calculate the inverse FT of your ##F(\omega)##? [BTW: it should be called ##F(\omega)##, not ##F(i \omega)## or ##F(j \omega)##.] You already know how you obtained ##F## from your original function ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t)##. Are you just trying to practice, to see if you can do the integral and get back your ##f(t)##, or are you fundamentally misunderstanding something about about the subject?

I'm just trying to practice...

vela said:
It's traditional to use the Greek letter omega, ##\omega##, not ##w##. (I hope you don't say "double-u" when you're talking to others, especially your instructor.)It's straightforward to calculate that integral if you know how to do contour integration in the complex plane. I'm guessing you probably haven't seen that yet.

I know it's omega, just didn't write it :)
I'm not familiar with contour integration yet, but I would like to see solution...
 
The idea is to consider the integral along the real axis as part of a closed contour in the complex plane. The rest of the contour doesn't contribute to the integral, so you have
$$\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{a+i\omega} e^{i\omega t}\,d\omega = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_C \frac{1}{a+iz} e^{izt}\,dz.$$ The latter integral can be evaluated using the residue theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etf

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K