Inverse Mellin transform of the Gamma function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rfael
  • Start date Start date
Rfael
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
which is the inverse Melin transform of the square of the gamma function
Relevant Equations
$$ \Gamma(s)^2 $$
need a hint to solve this inverse mellin transform involving the square of the Gamma function
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, it’s Mellin transform, which I haven’t heard of either. But a quick read of the Wiki page suggests contour integration to me. Where are the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## in the complex ##s##-plane?
 
They are mentioned briefly in Arfken, where it is noted that substituting ##t=\ln x## and ##i \omega = s -c## (possibly a typo — perhaps it should be ##i \omega = s -ic##?) into the Fourier transform and its inverse leads to

\begin{align*}
G(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx \qquad \text{the Mellin transformation}
\end{align*}

and

\begin{align*}
F(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} x^{-s} G(s) ds
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
My initial thought was to approach this using complex contour integration due to the structure of the inverse transform. However, there appears to be a possibly more straightforward way to derive the inverse Mellin transform.

Consider

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty \left( \int_0^\infty u^{s-1} e^{-u} du \right) t^{s-1} e^{-t} dt
\end{align*}

By applying a change of variables and interchanging the order of integration, this can be rewritten in the form

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx
\end{align*}

where ##F(x)## is an integral over ##t## that is closely related to the integral representation of a special function.
 
Alternatively, following the suggestion made by @Paul Colby. Note,

\begin{align*}
\Gamma(s)=\frac{1}{s}\Gamma(s+1)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)}\Gamma(s+2)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)(s+2) \cdots (s+n)}\Gamma(s+n+1)
\end{align*}

What does that tell us about the poles of ##\Gamma (s)^2##?

Here are useful formula for working out the residues at the poles:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s) = \frac{\Gamma (s+n+1)}{s(s+1) \cdots (s+n)} \quad \text{and} \quad \psi (s) = \frac{\Gamma' (s)}{\Gamma (s)} = -\gamma + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k+s})
\end{align*}

where ##\psi (s)## is the digamma function and ##\gamma## is Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Consider the rectangular contour ##\mathcal{C}## with vertices ##c \pm iR## (##c > 0##) and ##−(N + 1/2) \pm iR##, where ##N## is a positive integer. Then the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## inside this contour are at ##0, −1, −2, . . . , −N##. Hence, Cauchy’s residue theorem implies that

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_\mathcal{C} x^{-s} \Gamma (s)^2 ds = \sum_{n=0}^N Res (x ^{−s} \Gamma (s)^2 ,s=−n)
\end{align*}

Let ##R## and ##N## tend to infinity. You need to show that the Stirling's asymptotic formula for the Gamma function squared:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \lim_{|s| \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2 \pi}{s} s^{2s} e^{-2s}
\end{align*}

implies the integral on ##\mathcal{C}## minus the line joining ##c − iR## and ##c + iR## tends to zero.

You then obtain a series expansion for ##F(x)## closely related to that of a special function.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Paul Colby
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top