Inverse Mellin transform of the Gamma function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rfael
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inverse Mellin transform of the square of the Gamma function, with suggestions for using contour integration and examining poles in the complex plane. The Gamma function's poles are identified, and a change of variables is proposed to express the transform in a more manageable form. The conversation also references the relationship between the Gamma function and its derivatives, including the digamma function, to analyze residues at the poles. The application of Cauchy’s residue theorem is highlighted as a method to evaluate the integral, leading to a series expansion for the function involved. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the connection between the Gamma function and special functions through the inverse Mellin transform.
Rfael
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
which is the inverse Melin transform of the square of the gamma function
Relevant Equations
$$ \Gamma(s)^2 $$
need a hint to solve this inverse mellin transform involving the square of the Gamma function
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, it’s Mellin transform, which I haven’t heard of either. But a quick read of the Wiki page suggests contour integration to me. Where are the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## in the complex ##s##-plane?
 
They are mentioned briefly in Arfken, where it is noted that substituting ##t=\ln x## and ##i \omega = s -c## (possibly a typo — perhaps it should be ##i \omega = s -ic##?) into the Fourier transform and its inverse leads to

\begin{align*}
G(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx \qquad \text{the Mellin transformation}
\end{align*}

and

\begin{align*}
F(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} x^{-s} G(s) ds
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
My initial thought was to approach this using complex contour integration due to the structure of the inverse transform. However, there appears to be a possibly more straightforward way to derive the inverse Mellin transform.

Consider

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty \left( \int_0^\infty u^{s-1} e^{-u} du \right) t^{s-1} e^{-t} dt
\end{align*}

By applying a change of variables and interchanging the order of integration, this can be rewritten in the form

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx
\end{align*}

where ##F(x)## is an integral over ##t## that is closely related to the integral representation of a special function.
 
Alternatively, following the suggestion made by @Paul Colby. Note,

\begin{align*}
\Gamma(s)=\frac{1}{s}\Gamma(s+1)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)}\Gamma(s+2)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)(s+2) \cdots (s+n)}\Gamma(s+n+1)
\end{align*}

What does that tell us about the poles of ##\Gamma (s)^2##?

Here are useful formula for working out the residues at the poles:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s) = \frac{\Gamma (s+n+1)}{s(s+1) \cdots (s+n)} \quad \text{and} \quad \psi (s) = \frac{\Gamma' (s)}{\Gamma (s)} = -\gamma + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k+s})
\end{align*}

where ##\psi (s)## is the digamma function and ##\gamma## is Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Consider the rectangular contour ##\mathcal{C}## with vertices ##c \pm iR## (##c > 0##) and ##−(N + 1/2) \pm iR##, where ##N## is a positive integer. Then the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## inside this contour are at ##0, −1, −2, . . . , −N##. Hence, Cauchy’s residue theorem implies that

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_\mathcal{C} x^{-s} \Gamma (s)^2 ds = \sum_{n=0}^N Res (x ^{−s} \Gamma (s)^2 ,s=−n)
\end{align*}

Let ##R## and ##N## tend to infinity. You need to show that the Stirling's asymptotic formula for the Gamma function squared:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \lim_{|s| \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2 \pi}{s} s^{2s} e^{-2s}
\end{align*}

implies the integral on ##\mathcal{C}## minus the line joining ##c − iR## and ##c + iR## tends to zero.

You then obtain a series expansion for ##F(x)## closely related to that of a special function.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Paul Colby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
952
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K