Inverse Mellin transform of the Gamma function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rfael
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the inverse Mellin transform of the square of the Gamma function, exploring its properties and implications in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of contour integration and the location of poles in the complex plane. There are attempts to express the Gamma function in terms of integrals and to derive the inverse Mellin transform through various substitutions and transformations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes multiple approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting different methods of integration and questioning the assumptions made about the Gamma function's properties. Guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the inverse transform and the implications of the poles.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential typos in the transformations and the need to clarify the behavior of the Gamma function at its poles. Participants are also considering the implications of Stirling's approximation in their analysis.

Rfael
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
which is the inverse Melin transform of the square of the gamma function
Relevant Equations
$$ \Gamma(s)^2 $$
need a hint to solve this inverse mellin transform involving the square of the Gamma function
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, it’s Mellin transform, which I haven’t heard of either. But a quick read of the Wiki page suggests contour integration to me. Where are the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## in the complex ##s##-plane?
 
They are mentioned briefly in Arfken, where it is noted that substituting ##t=\ln x## and ##i \omega = s -c## (possibly a typo — perhaps it should be ##i \omega = s -ic##?) into the Fourier transform and its inverse leads to

\begin{align*}
G(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx \qquad \text{the Mellin transformation}
\end{align*}

and

\begin{align*}
F(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{c-i \infty}^{c+i \infty} x^{-s} G(s) ds
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
My initial thought was to approach this using complex contour integration due to the structure of the inverse transform. However, there appears to be a possibly more straightforward way to derive the inverse Mellin transform.

Consider

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty \left( \int_0^\infty u^{s-1} e^{-u} du \right) t^{s-1} e^{-t} dt
\end{align*}

By applying a change of variables and interchanging the order of integration, this can be rewritten in the form

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1} F(x) dx
\end{align*}

where ##F(x)## is an integral over ##t## that is closely related to the integral representation of a special function.
 
Alternatively, following the suggestion made by @Paul Colby. Note,

\begin{align*}
\Gamma(s)=\frac{1}{s}\Gamma(s+1)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)}\Gamma(s+2)=\frac{1}{s(s+1)(s+2) \cdots (s+n)}\Gamma(s+n+1)
\end{align*}

What does that tell us about the poles of ##\Gamma (s)^2##?

Here are useful formula for working out the residues at the poles:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s) = \frac{\Gamma (s+n+1)}{s(s+1) \cdots (s+n)} \quad \text{and} \quad \psi (s) = \frac{\Gamma' (s)}{\Gamma (s)} = -\gamma + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k+s})
\end{align*}

where ##\psi (s)## is the digamma function and ##\gamma## is Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Consider the rectangular contour ##\mathcal{C}## with vertices ##c \pm iR## (##c > 0##) and ##−(N + 1/2) \pm iR##, where ##N## is a positive integer. Then the poles of ##\Gamma(s)^2## inside this contour are at ##0, −1, −2, . . . , −N##. Hence, Cauchy’s residue theorem implies that

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_\mathcal{C} x^{-s} \Gamma (s)^2 ds = \sum_{n=0}^N Res (x ^{−s} \Gamma (s)^2 ,s=−n)
\end{align*}

Let ##R## and ##N## tend to infinity. You need to show that the Stirling's asymptotic formula for the Gamma function squared:

\begin{align*}
\Gamma (s)^2 = \lim_{|s| \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2 \pi}{s} s^{2s} e^{-2s}
\end{align*}

implies the integral on ##\mathcal{C}## minus the line joining ##c − iR## and ##c + iR## tends to zero.

You then obtain a series expansion for ##F(x)## closely related to that of a special function.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and Paul Colby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K