Inverse of Exponential Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of an exponential function, specifically the equation h(x) = 3(4^{(x-1)}) + 2. Participants are exploring the application of logarithmic properties to manipulate the equation for the purpose of finding its inverse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to isolate x, including subtracting constants and applying logarithmic functions. There is a focus on using both natural logarithms and logarithms with base four. Some participants express confusion regarding the steps involved and seek clarification on their reasoning.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on how to proceed with the problem. Some have offered alternative approaches and corrections to earlier steps, while others are still grappling with the concepts involved in finding the inverse.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that this problem is more complex than previous questions they have encountered, indicating a learning curve associated with the topic of inverses and logarithms. There is also mention of challenges with LaTeX formatting in the discussion.

Murdoc88
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Alright, I'm just going through my older tests in preparation for my upcoming exams and I have come across a question regarding exponents and inverses.


Homework Statement



The original equation is:

[itex]h(x) = 3(4^{(x-1)})+2[/itex]

and I must find the inverse in order to proceed with the rest of the question.


Homework Equations



Now I know the basic stuff of Logs, Natural Logarithms and Exponents such as the basic rules:

Change of Base
Product
Quotient
Power

and I can do the other questions on the test but it is this one question with the additional constants that is throwing my mathematical abilities out of the window

If someone could just give me some guidance on how to approach this problem I would be eternally grateful.

- Murdoc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also inside the brackets it is suppose to be 4^(x-1). I'm still new with the Latex coding
 
So you have some equation of the form [itex]y=3(4^{(x-1)})+2[/itex]. To find this inverse of this function, you need to make x the subject of the formula. So, firstly, subtract 2 and divide by 3 to give [tex]\frac{y-2}{3}=4^{(x-1)}[/tex]. Now, you can take the natural log of both sides, and use rules of logarithms to simplify. Alternatively, you could use logarithm with base four. Can you go on from here?
 
I'm still confused as I've never done a question to this extent before, so it's still a relatively new concept to understand.

If I take the Log base 4 route I end up with this:

(x-1) = Log(4)((y-2)/3)
X-1 = -3Log(4)(Y-2)

Is this correct or am I missing something? and if that's correct, where would I go from here?

X=-3Log(4)(Y-2)+1?
 
Last edited:
log a/b = log a - log b
 
Murdoc88 said:
I'm still confused as I've never done a question to this extent before, so it's still a relatively new concept to understand.

If I take the Log base 4 route I end up with this:

(x-1) = Log(4)((y-2)/3)
X-1 = -3Log(4)(Y-2)

Is this correct or am I missing something? and if that's correct, where would I go from here?

X=-3Log(4)(Y-2)+1?

To express shramana's point more succintly; this line is correct:
[tex]x-1 = \log_4(\frac{y-2}{3})[/tex]
However, your next line is incorrect. You could simplify this using the logarithm of quotients rule then add 1 to both sides, or could just leave it as log((y-2)/3) and add 1 to both sides. It's up to you really.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K