Invertible Operator with 0's on the Diagonal: What Conditions are Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cubixguy77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Operator
Click For Summary
An example of an invertible operator with zeros on the diagonal can be represented by a 2x2 matrix of the form M=[[0,a],[b,0]]. The key condition for this matrix to be invertible is that the product of the off-diagonal elements (a and b) must be non-zero, ensuring that the determinant is not zero. The discussion emphasizes that understanding the conditions for invertibility can be achieved without directly calculating the determinant, particularly for those who have not yet covered this topic in class. Participants are encouraged to explore methods for finding the inverse of the matrix directly. This approach allows for a deeper understanding of matrix properties despite the initial focus on diagonal elements.
cubixguy77
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Give an example of an operator whose matrix with respect to some basis contains only 0's on the diagonal, but the operator is invertible.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the operator will not have an upper-triangular matrix since it would then not be invertible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, what you after is not upper triangular. What are some alternatives?
 
i'm still unsure of what the diagonal values represent
if the diagonals are all 0, what does that tell you about the operator?
 
No body said all the diagonals are 0, just the main diagonal. Start simple. Try a 2 by 2 matrix with 0s on the diagonal. Now, you know that a matrix is invertible as long as its determinant is not 0. Just fill in the other two numbers so the determinant is not 0.
 
our class was taught such that we're leaving determinants out until the end of the year...
so that doesn't tell me a whole heck of a lot
if the diagonal is all 0's, what condition would make the matrix invertible (aside from anything having to do with determinants) ?
 
Well if it's a two dimensional matrix, A, you could easily find the inverse of it and show that AA^{-1}=I=A^{-1}A. That way you wouldn't need to find its determinant.
 
cubixguy77 said:
our class was taught such that we're leaving determinants out until the end of the year...
so that doesn't tell me a whole heck of a lot
if the diagonal is all 0's, what condition would make the matrix invertible (aside from anything having to do with determinants) ?

You must know SOME way to find the inverse of a matrix. Take M=[[0,a],[b,0]], put it into that method and figure out what conditions a and b need to satisfy for it to have an inverse.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K