Prove that linear operator is invertible

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The linear operator \(\mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R^3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R^3}\) defined by \(\mathcal{A}(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x_1+x_2-x_3, x_2+7x_3, -x_3)\) is proven to be invertible. The matrix representation of \(\mathcal{A}\) is \(T = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 7 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}\). The inverse can be derived using the Jordan decomposition method, and it is confirmed that the operator can also be inverted without matrix computation by solving the corresponding linear equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations
  • Familiarity with Jordan decomposition
  • Ability to solve linear equations
  • Knowledge of canonical basis in \(\mathbb{R^3}\)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear operators in \(\mathbb{R^n}\)
  • Learn about Jordan decomposition in detail
  • Explore methods for proving invertibility of linear transformations
  • Practice solving systems of linear equations using substitution and elimination
USEFUL FOR

Students in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in linear transformations, and educators teaching concepts of invertibility in vector spaces.

gruba
Messages
203
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let \mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R^3}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^3} is a linear operator defined as \mathcal{A}(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x_1+x_2-x_3, x_2+7x_3, -x_3)
Prove that \mathcal{A} is invertible and find matrix of \mathcal{A},A^{-1} in terms of canonical basis of \mathbb{R^3}.

Homework Equations


-Linear transformations
-Jordan decomposition

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Linear mapping can be written as
\mathcal{A}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> x_3 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_1+x_2-x_3 \\<br /> x_2+7x_3 \\<br /> -x_3 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

Matrix of linear operator \mathcal{A} is T=<br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 7 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> <br />

Using Jordan decomposition method, it is possible to find T,T^{-1} in terms of canonical basis.

How to strictly prove that \mathcal{A} is invertible (without matrix computation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gruba said:

Homework Statement


Let \mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R^3}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^3} is a linear operator defined as \mathcal{A}(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x_1+x_2-x_3, x_2+7x_3, -x_3)
Prove that \mathcal{A} is invertible and find matrix of \mathcal{A},A^{-1} in terms of canonical basis of \mathbb{R^3}.

Homework Equations


-Linear transformations
-Jordan decomposition

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Linear mapping can be written as
\mathcal{A}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> x_3 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_1+x_2-x_3 \\<br /> x_2+7x_3 \\<br /> -x_3 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

Matrix of linear operator \mathcal{A} is T=<br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 7 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> <br />

Using Jordan decomposition method, it is possible to find T,T^{-1} in terms of canonical basis.

How to strictly prove that \mathcal{A} is invertible (without matrix computation)?

This belongs in the "Precalculus" math forum, not the Advanced Physics forum.

Anyway, you do not need to use matrices in this problem: you just want to show that ##{\cal A}:\vec{x} \rightarrow \vec{y}## can be inverted, which means there is a map ##{\cal B}: \vec{y} \rightarrow \vec{x}## with the property that ##\vec{x} = {\cal B \, A} \vec{x}##. This amounts to simply solving the linear equations
x_1+x_2-x_3 =y_1, \: x_2+7x_3 = y_2, \: -x_3 = y_3
to determine the ##x_i## in terms of the ##y_j##. That is a simple high-school algebra exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K