Can you easily invert 3 by 3 matrices using a simple formula?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The Divine Zephyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matricies
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the process of inverting 3x3 matrices using Gaussian elimination, a method that simplifies the matrix to find its inverse. Participants confirm that the inverse can be derived by augmenting the matrix with the identity matrix and performing row operations until the left side becomes the identity matrix. Additionally, it is established that not all matrices have inverses; specifically, singular matrices, which have a determinant of zero, do not possess inverses. The formula for the inverse of a matrix is also mentioned: inverse of A = 1/(det(A)) * adj(A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian elimination
  • Familiarity with matrix notation and operations
  • Knowledge of determinants and their significance
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of Gaussian elimination in detail
  • Learn how to calculate determinants for various matrix sizes
  • Explore the adjugate matrix and its role in finding inverses
  • Practice solving for the inverse of different types of matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding matrix operations and their applications in solving systems of equations.

The Divine Zephyr
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Anyone know how to do it? Please provide an easy explanation. Please help. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it like inverting any other form of matrix? You write up your matrix and the identity matrix like so:

Code:
a b c | 1 0 0
d e f | 0 1 0
g h i | 0 0 1

And perform Gaussian elimination until you reach:

Code:
1 0 0 | x y z
0 1 0 | p q w
0 0 1 | r t u

Then the matrix to the right of the |-signs is the inverse you're looking for.
 
Last edited:
Yep. There are other methods (cofactors divided by determinant) but row-reduction is the simplest.
 
Originally posted by Muzza
Isn't it like inverting any other form of matrix? You write up your matrix and the identity matrix like so:

Code:
a b c | 1 0 0
d e f | 0 1 0
g h i | 0 0 1

And perform Gaussian elimination until you reach:

Code:
1 0 0 | x y z
0 1 0 | p q w
0 0 1 | r t u

Then the matrix to the right of the |-signs is the inverse you're looking for.

Awesome! But.. umm... what is Gaussian elimination?
 
If you are going to ask questions about Linear Algebra it would be a good idea to read at least the first few chapters of a textbook on linear algebra!

"Gaussian Elimination" is basically the method of "elimination of variables" to solve a system of equations- multiply one equation by a number, add to another in order to eliminate one of the variables. It is often used specifically to denote the same thing applied to matrices of coefficients of the equations.
 
Oh, that? I get it. Thank you.
 
My reply

hello.

It would also be better to practice solving for the inverse of a matrix. And, it would be easier for you if you know know the topic by heart. =)

Of course, not all matrices have an inverse, or what we call a nonsingular matrix. This is very "special" later in the topic.
One example is the use of determinants.

Start with basics
 


Originally posted by franz32

Of course, not all matrices have an inverse, or what we call a nonsingular matrix. This is very "special" later in the topic.
One example is the use of determinants.

Start with basics


Yeah if the determinant of a matrix is zero, it does not contain an inverse and is a nonsingular matrix.
 
You've got singular and nonsingular backward. Singular matrices have zero determinants and don't have inverses, because in computing the inverse you divide by the determinant (even if you don't think you do!) and dividing by zero is a "singular" mathematical operation, i.e. not defined.

Nonsingular matrices do have inverses, and necessarily then they have nonzero determinants.
 
  • #10
I believe the formula for the inverse of a nxn matrix is

inverse of A = 1/(det(A)) * adj(A)

i speak under correction. we did this last year and i have forgotten most of last year's stuff during the holidays
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K