Inverting a function? f(y) instead of f(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter iLIKEstuff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on inverting a 7th-order polynomial function to calculate the difference in X for a given Y. The original poster has coefficients for two curves and seeks a method to derive f(y) from f(x). They initially attempted a 90-degree rotation of the data but found it ineffective due to altered X values. Ultimately, they successfully used eigenvalues to find the roots of the polynomial equations, filtering out complex and distant roots based on their knowledge of the expected X values. This approach allowed them to achieve the desired comparison between the fitted curves.
iLIKEstuff
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to compare two fitted curves by looking at the difference in x. Standard regression analysis tools always give you a delta Y (residual) and this is how the fit is done in the first place.

So I have the coefficients of each of the terms for my 7th-order polynomial. it's in the form

y = f(x) = ax^7 + bx^6 + cx^5 + dx^4 + ex^3 + fx^2 + gx + h

The two curves have slightly different coefficients. Now how do I invert this function to get an f(y) so that I can calculate the difference in X for a given Y?

This problem is easy for a simple function like y = f(x) = ax^2 then inverting it you get x = f(y) = \sqrt{y}/a for positive y-values.

Since I have the actual X and Y sets of values, I tried rotating the values 90 degrees (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix) and then looking at the delta Y, but the problem is the X values aren't the same anymore. Yes, a somewhat pointless attempt, but potentially serendipitous nonetheless.

I have the X and Y data and also have access to a basic PC with MATLAB for number crunching if needed.
Are there any clever tricks I can play to get the difference in X for a given Y? I'm sure I'm missing something here...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since polynomials are infinitely-differentiable, you can use the inverse function theorem to determine where/if a local or global inverse exists. For one, your function must be 1-1 and onto ℝ (which I assume is your codomain) for a global inverse to exist.

You may want to try 'solving for x' in your equation, see what you get.
 
Thanks for the help. I managed to figure it out using eigenvalues to find the roots and also the fact that I know roughly what the root should be (since my function is completely arbitrary). Basically I fed in the Y values for both equations, then solved each one for X by finding the eigenvalues. Since I know the X for one set isn't too far off from the X in the other set, I can reject all complex roots and roots that are way off.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
804
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K