Ion moving through electric potential difference and magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the acceleration of a positively charged ion moving through two gaps with opposing electric potential differences. Despite the potential difference suggesting the ion should slow down when moving from lower to higher potential, it is clarified that the ion continues to accelerate due to the opposite sign of the electric potential difference in the second gap. The conversation also highlights potential confusion regarding the notation used for speed and voltage, emphasizing the need for clarity in distinguishing between variables. Additionally, the relationship between magnetic fields in the two regions is explored, with calculations indicating that the ratio of magnetic fields depends on the velocities of the ion. The conclusion drawn is that the motion of the charged ion and its intrinsic magnetic properties can lead to torque effects, consistent with Newton's third law.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
A positively charged ion with charge ##q## and mass ##m##, initially at rest inside the source, is accelerated across a gap by an electric potential difference with magnitude ##\Delta v## . The ion enters a region of uniform magnetic field ##B_1## pointing into the page of the figure below and follows a semi-circular trajectory of radius ##R_1##. The ion is again accelerated across the gap, increasing its speed, by an electric potential difference that has the opposite sign but has the same magnitude ##|\Delta v|##. The ion then enters a region of uniform magnetic field ##B_2## pointing into the page of the figure below and follows a semi-circular trajectory of radius ##R_2##.
Relevant Equations
a) What is the ratio ##B_2/B_1##?

b) What is the ratio ##v_2/v_1##?
My question is about item (b).

1712214908771.png


For item (a) we have uniform circular motion in the regions with uniform magnetic field.

$$\vec{F}_{B_1}=qv\hat{\theta}_1\times B_1(-\hat{k})=-qv_1B_1\hat{r}_1=-mR_1\theta'^2\hat{r}_1\tag{1}$$

$$B_1=\frac{mv_1}{R_1q}\tag{2}$$

A similar calculation for the bottom portion of the trajectory gives

$$B_2=\frac{mv_2}{R_2q}\tag{3}$$

Thus,

$$\frac{B_2}{B_1}=\frac{R_1v_2}{R_2v_1}\tag{4}$$

As for item (b), I don't understand the following.

The problem statement says that the ion is accelerated in both of the gaps. It also says that the electric potential difference in the gap on the left is the negative of the electric potential difference of the gap on the right.

How then can a positively charged ion accelerate across both gaps?

Let's assume that the potential at the "source" is higher than on the top part of the gap above it.

$$q\Delta v=-W=-\Delta K_e=-\frac{mv_1^2}{2}\tag{5}$$

$$v_1=\sqrt{-\frac{2q}\Delta V}{m}}\tag{6}$$

Note that ##\Delta v<0##.

Now consider the gap on the left side.

The speed of the ion is the same ##v_1## when it enters the gap, but now it is traversing from a lower to a higher potential as a positive charge. Shouldn't it slow down (to zero speed)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the problem states that the speed increases during both acceleration stages and the potential difference in the drawing is a magnitude. What does that indicate to you?
 
zenterix said:
$$\frac{B_2}{B_1}=\frac{R_1v_2}{R_2v_1}\tag{4}$$
I don't think the velocities should figure in the answer. Can you see how to get rid of those?
zenterix said:
It also says that the electric potential difference in the gap on the left is the negative of the electric potential difference of the gap on the right.
It must mean the p.d. is in the opposite direction relative to the diagram, so in the same direction relative to the path.
 
zenterix said:
$$v_1=\sqrt{-\frac{2q\Delta V} {m}}\tag{6}$$
Note that ##\Delta v<0##.
Note that the use of ##v## for both speed and voltage is error-prone ! So is the use of ##\Delta v## and ##\Delta V## for one and the same variable

zenterix said:
the speed of the ion is the same v1 when it enters the gap, but now it is traversing from a lower to a higher potential as a positive charge. Shouldn't it slow down (to zero speed)?
That's not the intention:
zenterix said:
The ion is again accelerated across the gap, increasing its speed, by an electric potential difference that has the opposite sign but has the same magnitude ##|\Delta v|##.
but I grant you the wording is confusing. I think they have a ##\Delta V \equiv V_{top}-V_{bot} ## definition.

The cyclotron principle is explained here

##\ ##
 
haruspex said:
I don't think the velocities should figure in the answer. Can you see how to get rid of those?
Why don't you think the velocities should be there?

This problem has an automatic grading system. The expression for ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}## checks out.

There is an item (c) to this problem that I did not show. It is to suppose that ##R_2=2R_1## and compute what ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}## is.

Since ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}## has a ##\frac{v_2}{v_1}## term in it, which in item (b) comes out to be ##\sqrt{2}##, we can sub this in to get ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.
 
BvU said:
Note that the use of v for both speed and voltage is error-prone ! So is the use of Δv and ΔV for one and the same variable
I am using ##v## for speed and ##\Delta V## for potential difference. The use of ##\Delta v## in the OP is a typo.
 
zenterix said:
Since ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}## has a ##\frac{v_2}{v_1}## term in it, which in item (b) comes out to be ##\sqrt{2}##, we can sub this in to get ##\frac{B_2}{B_1}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.
That's why I thought the velocities should not appear in the first answer.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and zenterix
The moving charges have intrinsic magnetic loop.
From David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, Fourth Edition}, page 462, ISBN-13: 978-0-321-85656-2, 2013.

1716318908398.png


The moving charge follows curved trajectory and therefore the intrinsic magnetic loop rotates.
If the intrinsic magnetic loop rotates then the conservation of angular momentum means the plates/device are being torqued in the opposite direction.
Is this correct conclusion?
 
Last edited:
One cannot argue against Newton's third law.
 
Back
Top