How Accurate Is the Estimated Ionization Energy Formula for Hydrogen?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on estimating the ionization energy of a hydrogen atom using electrostatic potential energy concepts from quantum mechanics. The calculated value of 1.4 MeV is identified as significantly inaccurate, being approximately 100,000 times too large due to an incorrect assumption about the electron's radius. The discussion emphasizes the limitations of the semi-classical model in accurately representing electron behavior, suggesting that while the model is flawed, it can still provide a rough estimate of ionization energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with electrostatic potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of Bohr model of the atom
  • Basic grasp of wave-function probability density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom in detail
  • Learn about quantum mechanics wave functions and their implications
  • Explore the concept of electrostatic potential energy in atomic systems
  • Investigate modern methods for calculating ionization energies, such as quantum chemistry simulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and atomic theory, as well as researchers interested in the ionization energy of hydrogen and related atomic phenomena.

CatWoman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Estimate the energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom and hence deduce an approximate formula for the ionization energy of hydrogen. How accurate is your formula?


Homework Equations


Don't know but it is in the field of quantum mechanics


The Attempt at a Solution



Ionisation Energy is energy required to remove an electron.

Electrostatic Potential (energy per unit charge) V=q/(4πε_0 r)= e/(4πε_0 r)

For a Bohr atom (Z=1), energy required to remove an electron from the atom with a nucleus of charge e and a radius r0 is the Electrostatic Potential Energy:

PE=qV = e^2/(4πε_0 r)×1/e
=(1.6×10^(-19))/(4π×8.85×10^(-12)×10^(-15) )
=1.4MeV

The equation estimates the distance of the electron from the proton in the nucleus as a precise value – this is not the case. An electron’s position is given by a wave-function probability density and it is in effect occupying the whole of the atom at once.

IS ANY OF THIS RIGHT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.4MeV is about 100,000 times too large.

I think it's because your radius appears to be 100,000 times too small.

You are right that this semi-classical model of the electron is wrong, but you can get a good estimate of the ionization energy using this. And I think that's what the question asks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K