Ionization ENERGY -Why removal of electron from gaseous atom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ionization energy is defined as the energy required to remove the outermost electron from a neutral atom in the gas phase. The discussion clarifies that removing electrons from solids is not feasible due to the strong intermolecular attractions between adjacent atoms, which necessitate overcoming multiple atomic attractions. In contrast, gaseous atoms are isolated and interact minimally, allowing for easier measurement of ionization energy. The distinction between isolated gaseous atoms and isolated solid atoms is emphasized, with the former being distinguishable due to their lack of interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionization energy and its definition
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and electron configurations
  • Knowledge of gas laws and atomic interactions in different states of matter
  • Basic principles of solid-state physics and atomic bonding
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methods for measuring ionization energy in gas phase versus solid state
  • Explore the concept of atomic interactions in solids, including band theory
  • Study the differences between isolated atoms in gaseous and solid states
  • Learn about the implications of ionization energy on chemical reactivity and bonding
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, physicists, and anyone interested in atomic theory, particularly those studying the properties of gases and solids.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
Why ionization energy is defined as the energy required to remove the outermost, or highest energy, electron from a neutral atom in the gas phase. Why can't we remove electrons from a solid,can we?
If not ,what's the reason?I think we can not remove electrons from a solid because in gas phase molecules or gaseous atoms are far apart so in order to remove electron we just have to overcome attraction of nucleus of that particular atom from which we are removing electrons.But in solid state ,there is attraction between adjacent atoms ,so to remove electrons we have to overcome attraction of several atoms .Am I right?

Sorry if my reasoning is just not making any sense.But in order to correct myself I will have to show my thinking, my views.Doesn't matter right or wrong.
Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ionization energy is a property of an atom. If you were removing the electron from a solid it would be a property of a bulk solid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Borek said:
If you were removing the electron from a solid it would be a property of a bulk solid.
Why we can have isolated gaseous atom but not isolated solid atom?
 
gracy said:
Why we can have isolated gaseous atom but not isolated solid atom?

Isolated solid atom is no longer part of a solid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
That means isolated solid atoms do exist.
 
No, it doesn't mean that. Isolated atom is not in contact with anything, so it is indistinguishable from the gaseous atom.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Borek said:
Isolated solid atom is no longer part of a solid.
In definition of ionization energy ,it is gaseous atom not isolated gaseous atom,right?I mean
Borek said:
Isolated solid atom is no longer part of a solid.
And what about isolated gaseous atom?Is it still part of gas.
 
Atoms in gas are separate entities that - for most time - don't interact (the lower the pressure, the rarer the collisions that are the only interaction). Atoms in solid are held together by their interactions and their orbitals overlap, creating bands (which are in a way equivalents of orbitals spreading throughout the whole solid). These are entirely different situations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Oh!I now understand the whole concept.Thanks a lot @Borek.
 
  • #10
This also has a purely technical aspect: The ionization energy in the gas phase is much easier and more precisely being measured than some energies in the solid state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K