IR thermometers and Blackbody Radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of infrared (IR) thermometers for measuring the temperature of blackbody emitters, particularly those that emit radiation peaking in the visible spectrum. Participants explore the limitations and considerations of using IR thermometers for high-temperature measurements and the role of emissivity in obtaining accurate readings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether IR thermometers can accurately measure the temperature of blackbodies at high temperatures, suggesting that they may only be effective for moderate temperatures that radiate primarily in the mid- or far-infrared regions.
  • Another participant argues that hot objects emit significant amounts of infrared radiation and that visible light should not interfere with temperature measurements, although they note that the design of the thermometer may affect its accuracy.
  • A later reply highlights that non-contact temperature measurements can yield erroneous results, especially if the object is not a perfect blackbody or if atmospheric absorption is a factor when measuring celestial bodies.
  • Emissivity is discussed as a critical factor in infrared temperature measurements, with one participant explaining that emissivity is the ratio of energy radiated by an object to that of a blackbody, and that most IR thermometers can compensate for different emissivity values.
  • Several methods for determining emissivity are proposed, including using known temperature samples, masking tape, drilling holes, coating with black paint, and utilizing standardized emissivity values.
  • One participant raises a concern about the practicality of determining emissivity for remote sensing operations, questioning the feasibility of obtaining samples from objects like missiles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of IR thermometers for high-temperature measurements and the implications of emissivity. There is no clear consensus on the best approach for measuring temperatures of blackbodies that emit in the visible spectrum.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of blackbody and emissivity, as well as the potential for atmospheric absorption affecting measurements of celestial objects. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in using IR thermometers for various materials and conditions.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
My question is about using an IR thermometer for measuring the temprature of a blackbody that emitts a spectrum that peaks somewhere in the visible region.

I think since these kind of thermometers measures the amount of infrared radiation emitted by the object, they can only determine the temprature of objects of moderate temprature that radiate in the mid-infrared region or colder ones that radiate in the far-infrared. So, does this mean we can't use them to determine the temprature of a blackbody that is about the same temprature as a star? And what happens if we use them to measure such hot objects?

Do we need a spectrometer for measuring the temprature of a blackbody which is extremely hot? (I've read this in an old thread, not sure if it is true)

I appreciate any clarification.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hot objects emit infrared radiation as well - they emit even more than colder objects. The large amount of visible light should not harm in that respect. So in principle, it is sufficient to measure the infrared spectrum to measure your temperature range. If they are designed to calculate with spectra in this temperature range is a different question.
 
roam said:
My question is about using an IR thermometer for measuring the temprature of a blackbody that emitts a spectrum that peaks somewhere in the visible region.
<snip>

Without knowing any details, it's hard to provide an explanation. Yes, non-contact temperature measurements (IR thermometers) can and will give erroneous results- especially if the object is not a blackbody or even a greybody. As for measuring the temperature of stars, you have to take into account atmospheric absorption.

However, one can calibrate an IR thermometer with a blackbody cavity, and if the IR thermometer uses several wavelengths instead of a total radiated power, they can be fairly useful as measuring devices.
 
What is emissivity, and how is it related to infrared temperature measurements?

Emissivity is defined as the ratio of the energy radiated by an object at a given temperature to the energy emitted by a perfect radiator, or blackbody, at the same temperature. The emissivity of a blackbody is 1.0. All values of emissivity fall between 0.0 and 1.0. Most infrared thermometers have the ability to compensate for different emissivity values, for different materials. In general, the higher the emissivity of an object, the easier it is to obtain an accurate temperature measurement using infrared. Objects with very low emissivities (below 0.2) can be difficult applications. Some polished, shiny metallic surfaces, such as aluminum, are so reflective in the infrared that accurate temperature measurements are not always possible.

There are five ways to determine the emissivity of the material, to ensure accurate temperature measurements:

1. Heat a sample of the material to a known temperature, using a precise sensor, and measure the temperature using the IR instrument. Then adjust the emissivity value to force the indicator to display the correct temperature.

2. For relatively low temperatures (up to 500°F), a piece of masking tape, with an emissivity of 0.95, can be measured. Then adjust the emissivity value to force the indicator to display the correct temperature of the material.

3. For high temperature measurements, a hole (depth of which is at least 6 times the diameter) can be drilled into the object. This hole acts as a blackbody with emissivity of 1.0. Measure the temperature in the hole, then adjust the emissivity to force the indicator to display the correct temperature of the material.

4. If the material, or a portion of it, can be coated, a dull black paint will have an emissivity of approx. 1.0. Measure the temperature of the paint, then adjust the emissivity to force the indicator to display the correct temperature.

5. Standardized emissivity values for most materials are available. These can be entered into the instrument to estimate the material’s emissivity value.

For more information, see also:
http://www.allqa.com/IR.htm
http://www.metrisinst.com/faqs-and-tutorials
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511254
http://www.coleparmer.com/TechLibraryArticle/377
http://www.wintron.com/infrared/guideir.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bobbywhy said:
<snip>

There are five ways to determine the emissivity of the material, to ensure accurate temperature measurements:

<snip>

That's fine if you have a piece of the material to work with. What about remote sensing operations? I don't think Kim Jong Un is going to lend you a piece of missile to experiment with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K