Iron block dropped into a container of water sitting on a scale

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a scale when an iron block is dropped into a container of water. Participants explore the effects of buoyancy, drag forces, and the relationship between the scale readings before and after the block is submerged.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question how the scale reading changes as the block sinks and whether drag forces affect this change. There are inquiries about the relationship between scale readings before and after immersion, and discussions on the net forces acting on the block during its descent.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the forces at play, including the weight of the block and the buoyant force. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of constant speed and drag forces, with multiple interpretations being considered regarding the scale's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves assumptions about drag and the conditions under which the block descends, indicating that these factors may influence the overall analysis.

Kate_12
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
consider a container filled with water on a scale. Now a block of iron of length L and cross section A has been dropped into this container. Due to the drag of the water on the block, the block drops at constant speed v. Let the depth of the water be 2L. At time t=0, the block hit the surface of the water. Describe the change of scale reading as a function of time. If there were no drag of the water, the iron block will fall freely in the water. Describe the change of scale reading as a function of time.
Relevant Equations
f=rho*V*g
Does the scale change during the block sinks? I am so confused...
Is there any difference on change of scale with the applying of drag force?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
First answer the following question:
What is the relationship between the reading on the scale when the block is fully immersed and the reading before the block enters the water?
 
Orodruin said:
First answer the following question:
What is the relationship between the reading on the scale when the block is fully immersed and the reading before the block enters the water?
Before the block enters the water, there is no change in scale (just the weight of container filled with water)
When the block is fully immersed, the change in scale would be the weight of the block, because the buoyancy force is just internal force.
 
Kate_12 said:
When the block is fully immersed, the change in scale would be the weight of the block, because the buoyancy force is just internal force.
So long as the block is not accelerating, yes.
We are not told with what speed the block hits the water, only that it descends at constant v until it hits the bottom. So I suppose you should assume it hits at speed v. That being the case, what is the net force on the block as a function of time? What does that imply for the force the water+container system exerts on the block?
 
haruspex said:
So long as the block is not accelerating, yes.
We are not told with what speed the block hits the water, only that it descends at constant v until it hits the bottom. So I suppose you should assume it hits at speed v. That being the case, what is the net force on the block as a function of time? What does that imply for the force the water+container system exerts on the block?
The net force on the block is zero because it drops at constant speed.
so the water+container system exerts m(the mass of the block)*g on the block.
That means, the change in scale would be the weight of the block.
Is it right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
Note that the buoyant force is the force exerted on the block by the water. What does Newton's Third Law tell you about the force exerted on the water by the block?
 
Kate_12 said:
The net force on the block is zero because it drops at constant speed.
so the water+container system exerts m(the mass of the block)*g on the block.
That means, the change in scale would be the weight of the block.
Is it right?
Yes.
Mister T said:
Note that the buoyant force is the force exerted on the block by the water. What does Newton's Third Law tell you about the force exerted on the water by the block?
In the first part of the question, we are told there is drag, so it is not just a matter of Archimedes' principle. Instead, we must use the constant speed information.
But Archimedes is certainly the way to approach the no drag case.
 
haruspex said:
Yes.

In the first part of the question, we are told there is drag, so it is not just a matter of Archimedes' principle. Instead, we must use the constant speed information.
But Archimedes is certainly the way to approach the no drag case.
So with drag force, the scale change would be mg(the weight of the block) regardless of time.
Without drag force, the net force on the block would be phro*V*g (V: the submerged volume of the block)
1) during submerging, the change of the scale would be phro*A*h*g(h: the submerged height of the block)
--> I can't calculate the h as a function of time...
2) after submerged, the change of the scale would be phro*A*L*g
3) after the block reaches the bottom of the container, the change of the scale would be mg(the weight of the block)
Is this a correct approach?
 
Kate_12 said:
So with drag force, the scale change would be mg(the weight of the block) regardless of time.
Without drag force, the net force on the block would be phro*V*g (V: the submerged volume of the block)
1) during submerging, the change of the scale would be phro*A*h*g(h: the submerged height of the block)
--> I can't calculate the h as a function of time...
2) after submerged, the change of the scale would be phro*A*L*g
3) after the block reaches the bottom of the container, the change of the scale would be mg(the weight of the block)
Is this a correct approach?
Yes, that is all correct, except that you mean "rho" (##\rho##), not "phro".
To get the force as a function of time in (1), you need a differential equation.
When it has descended distance h into the water, what is the net force on the block? What is its acceleration? Can you write the equation for ##\ddot h##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kate_12
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes, that is all correct, except that you mean "rho" (##\rho##), not "phro".
To get the force as a function of time in (1), you need a differential equation.
When it has descended distance h into the water, what is the net force on the block? What is its acceleration? Can you write the equation for ##\ddot h##?
mg-##\rho##*A*h*g=m*##\ddot h##

so integral 0 to h (dh^2/(m-##\rho##*A*h))= integral 0 to t (g/m)dt^2

I think I can solve this equation and there would be log term of h as a function of time.

I really appreciate for your help.
Have a nice day!
 
  • #11
Kate_12 said:
mg-##\rho##*A*h*g=m*##\ddot h##

so integral 0 to h (dh^2/(m-##\rho##*A*h))= integral 0 to t (g/m)dt^2

I think I can solve this equation and there would be log term of h as a function of time.

I really appreciate for your help.
Have a nice day!

No, you can't integrate one side wrt h and the other wrt t.
Your ODE has the general form ##\ddot y+Cy=D##. Do you recognise that?
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
No, you can't integrate one side wrt h and the other wrt t.
Your ODE has the general form ##\ddot y+Cy=D##. Do you recognise that?
Then, is there any general form of solution to ##\ddot y+Cy=D##?
 
  • #13
Kate_12 said:
Then, is there any general form of solution to ##\ddot y+Cy=D##?
Yes. If you have studied SHM you should recognise it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K