Irrational Numbers: Is It Possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of having an infinite string of the same digit within an irrational number. Specifically, the example of a number containing an infinite block of 5's followed by other digits is deemed nonsensical. The reasoning provided asserts that if a sequence of digits is infinite, it cannot terminate with additional digits, thus violating the definition of an irrational number. The concept of decimal expansion and sequences is clarified, emphasizing that a valid decimal representation must adhere to specific mathematical definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irrational numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with decimal expansions and sequences
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical mappings and functions
  • Concept of rational versus irrational numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of irrational numbers in depth
  • Learn about decimal expansions and their mathematical implications
  • Explore the concept of sequences in mathematics, particularly in relation to real numbers
  • Investigate the differences between rational and irrational numbers with examples
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of irrational numbers and decimal representations.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Is it possible to have an infinite string of the same number in the middle of an irrational number?
For example could I have 1.2232355555555.....3434343232211
Where their was an infinite block of 5's. Then I was trying to think of ways to prove or disprove this. It does seem like it might not be able to happen because if I had an infinite a 5's in a row then it seems like it would be a rational number.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The "number" you are speaking of is nonsensical. You can't have an infinite string of 5's, and then have numbers come after that. If there are infinitely many 5's, you can't add anything after that; because it would mean the string of 5's eventually terminates at some point, which violates the definition of "being infinite", or "not having an end". This makes all of your question nonsensical as a whole. Perhaps you meant something else, but couldn't phrase it properly?
 
If the 3434... part of the number exists, then the string of 5's before it terminates, hence not an infinite string.
 
You must be careful about what a decimal expansion actually is. Given a number ##x\geq 0##, a decimal expansion is a sequence

(x_0,~x_1,~x_2,~x_3,~...)

where ##x_0\in \mathbb{N}## and where ##0\leq x_i\leq 9## for ##i>0##. It must satisfy

x = x_0 + x_1\frac{1}{10} + x_2\frac{1}{10^2} + ...+ x_n \frac{1}{10^n}+...

What is a sequence? Well, it is a map ##f:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}##. We write ##f(n) = x_n##.

When you say you add an infinite number of ##5## in the middle, then this is invalid as it would not produce a sequence anymore. It is impossible to write something like that as a map from the naturals.
 
ok thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K