Irreducible factors of polynomial

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors Polynomial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of irreducible factors of a polynomial in the context of normal field extensions. Participants explore the implications of Galois theory and the behavior of irreducible polynomials over different fields, particularly focusing on the relationships between irreducible factors in the ring of polynomials over a normal extension.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the definition and implications of the Galois group $G(K/F)$ in relation to irreducible factors of a polynomial.
  • There is a suggestion that if a polynomial $f$ is expressed as a product of irreducible factors in $K[x]$, then each pair of factors should have an isomorphic mapping due to the properties of the Galois group.
  • One participant proposes a counterexample involving the polynomial $f(x)=x^4-2$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2})$, questioning whether the irreducible factors can be isomorphically mapped to each other.
  • Another participant notes that a normal extension implies that irreducible polynomials either have no roots in $K$ or split into linear factors, leading to the conclusion that if they split, they must have the same degree.
  • Concerns are raised about cases where a polynomial has no roots in $K$, and whether isomorphic mappings can still be established among irreducible factors in such scenarios.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the nature of normal extensions and the conditions under which polynomials can be factored.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of normal extensions and the behavior of irreducible factors. There is no consensus on whether the proposed relationships hold in all cases, particularly in the presence of counterexamples.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of definitions and properties of normal extensions, as well as the implications of the Galois group on the structure of irreducible factors. The discussion includes unresolved questions about specific cases and the nature of isomorphic mappings.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $f\in F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.
  1. Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$. Show that there exists $\sigma \in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=\sigma (g_1)$.
  2. If $f$ is reducible over $K$, show that all its irreducible factors in $K[x]$ have the same degree.

I don't really have an idea about that. Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $f\in F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.
  1. Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$. Show that there exists $\sigma \in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=\sigma (g_1)$.
  2. If $f$ is reducible over $K$, show that all its irreducible factors in $K[x]$ have the same degree.

I don't really have an idea about that. Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)

Hey mathmari!

1. What is $G(K/F)$?
2. Did you mean: $f$ is reducible over $K[x]$?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
1. What is $G(K/F)$?

It is the Galois group.
Klaas van Aarsen said:
2. Did you mean: $f$ is reducible over $K[x]$?

Oh yes, it must be a typo.
 
Doesn't (2) follow from (1)? (Wondering)

That is, suppose $f=g_1\cdot ... \cdot g_n$, where the $g_i$ are irreducible polynomials over $K[x]$.
Then each pair $g_i$ and $g_j$ must have an isomorphic mapping $\sigma$ between them, don't they?
And an isomorphic mapping implies that they are polynomials of the same degree, doesn't it?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Doesn't (2) follow from (1)? (Wondering)

That is, suppose $f=g_1\cdot ... \cdot g_n$, where the $g_i$ are irreducible polynomials over $K[x]$.
Then each pair $g_i$ and $g_j$ must have an isomorphic mapping $\sigma$ between them, don't they?
And an isomorphic mapping implies that they are polynomials of the same degree, doesn't it?

Ahh yes! (Nerd) And for (1) do we use the fact that each element of the Galois group permutes the roots of $f$ in a unique way? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
And for (1) do we use the fact that each element of the Galois group permutes the roots of $f$ in a unique way? (Wondering)

Maybe... (Thinking)

As an alternative approach I tried to find a counter example.
Suppose we pick $F=\mathbb Q$, $K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4] 2)$, and $f(x)=x^4-2$.
Then $f$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$.
And $f(x)=(x-\sqrt[4] 2)(x+\sqrt[4] 2)(x^2 + \sqrt 2)$ over $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4] 2)$, isn't it?
But that seems to contradict (1), since the irreducible factors do not isomorphically map to each other. (Sweating)
Am I missing something?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Maybe... (Thinking)

As an alternative approach I tried to find a counter example.
Suppose we pick $F=\mathbb Q$, $K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4] 2)$, and $f(x)=x^4-2$.
Then $f$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$.
And $f(x)=(x-\sqrt[4] 2)(x+\sqrt[4] 2)(x^2 + \sqrt 2)$ over $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4] 2)$, isn't it?
But that seems to contradict (1), since the irreducible factors do not isomorphically map to each other. (Sweating)
Am I missing something?

$K$ is a normal extension. Doesn't this mean that the polynomial must be splitted in linear factors in $K[x]$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
$K$ is a normal extension. Doesn't this mean that the polynomial must be splitted in linear factors in $K[x]$ ? (Wondering)

Ah okay. However, according to wiki:
An algebraic field extension K/F is said to be normal if every polynomial that is irreducible over F either has no root in K or splits into linear factors in K.


If $f$ splits into linear factors over $K$, then each factor has the same degree 1.
And according to the fact that 'each element of the Galois group permutes the roots of f in a unique way', it follows that we have an isomorphic mapping between each of the factors, doesn't it? (Wondering)

However, that leaves the possibility that $f$ has no roots in $K$...

For instance with $F=\mathbb Q, K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2), f(x)=x^4+4x^2+2$.
Then $f(x)=(x^2+2+\sqrt 2)(x^2+2-\sqrt 2)$.
How can we prove that in such cases we can also find an isomorphic mapping between the irreducible factors? (Sweating)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
1. What is $G(K/F)$?
The Galois group $G(K/F)$ of the field extension $K/F$ is the group of all automorphisms of the field $K$ that fixes every element of the field $F$. Here, $K$ is an extension of the field $F$, i.e. $F$ is a subfield of $K$. You see, field theory is a bit different from group theory: in group theory, given a group $G$, we are interested in analysing the subgroups of $G$, whereas in field theory, given a field $F$, we are more interested in constructing larger fields containing $F$ as a subfield (or containing a subfield isomorphic to $F$); these larger fields are called extensions of $F$.

In this problem, $K/F$ is a normal extension, meaning that given an irreducible polynomial $f\in F[x]$, either $f$ has no roots in $K$ or else it does and can be linearly factorized in $L$, i.e. splits over $L$. For example: $\mathbb Q\left(\sqrt2\right)/\mathbb Q$ is a normal extension. The polynomial $x^2-2$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$ but has a root in $\mathbb Q\left(\sqrt2\right)$ and $x^2-2=\left(x+\sqrt2\right)\left(x-\sqrt2\right)$ in $\mathbb Q\left(\sqrt2\right)$. On the other hand, $\mathbb Q\left(\sqrt[3]2\right)/\mathbb Q$ is not a normal extension: the polynomial $x^3-2$, irreducible over $\mathbb Q$, has a root in $\mathbb Q\left(\sqrt[3]2\right)$ but does not split therein.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K