Hi guys, I have a question which is very fundamental to representation theory.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What I am wondering is that whether a first rank cartesian representation of so(3) is irreducible.

As I understand first rank cartesian representation of so(3) can be parametrized in terms of the Euler angles. That matrix representation of so(3) contains sine and cosine of the three Euler angles which are rotation matrices that transform a vector (x,y,z).

So my understanding is that representation must be irreducible because each matrix in so(3) transform a vector by rotating it around a direction. However each matrix in so(3) rotates a vector around a different vector. Therefore there is no invariant one and two dimensional subspace of so(3).

That seems to be a plausible explanation. What I think to be more solid proof is to be able to say that any similarity transformation in so(3) does not simultaneously sent all representative of so(3) into one block diagonal form.

I was wondering if it is already proved in the literature or is there any way we can prove it.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Irreducible representation of so(3)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Irreducible representation | Date |
---|---|

Completeness and orthogonality of unitary irreducible representations | Feb 15, 2016 |

Irreducible representation of GL(D) | Dec 27, 2014 |

Irreducible representations of SL(2,C)? | Dec 13, 2014 |

Irreducible representation. I'm confused. | Jan 6, 2014 |

Irreducible Representations and Class | Oct 13, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**