Question about the irreducible representation of a rank 2 tensor under SO(3)

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

When discussing how a rank two tensor transforms under SO(3), we say that the tensor can be decomposed into three irreducible parts, the anti-symmetric part, traceless-symmetric part, and a 1-dimensional trace part, which transforms as a scalar. How do we know that the symmetric and anti-symmetric parts are truly irreducible, i.e. that they cannot be further block diagonalized via some change of basis?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,817
6,626
How do we know that the symmetric and anti-symmetric parts are truly irreducible, i.e. that they cannot be further block diagonalized via some change of basis?
The same way you show that any irrep is irreducible. Show that there are no invariant subspaces.
 
  • Like
Likes TroyElliott
  • #3
13,214
10,111
The same way you show that any irrep is irreducible. Show that there are no invariant subspaces.
You seem to understand the question. As it is in the math section and the wording is mathematical nonsense "the tensor can be decomposed into three irreducible parts", can you translate the question into math?
 
  • #4
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,817
6,626
You seem to understand the question. As it is in the math section and the wording is mathematical nonsense "the tensor can be decomposed into three irreducible parts", can you translate the question into math?
Given the fundamental representation of SO(3) on ##\mathbb R^3##, there is a natural representation on ##\mathbb R^3 \otimes \mathbb R^3##. This representation is reducible to one copy each of the 1, 3, and 5 dimensional irreps of SO(3). How do we know that these representations are irreducible?

Edit, Alternatively: A representation ##\rho## of SO(3) on the vector space of real 3x3 matrices is given by ##\rho(g) A = g A g^{-1}##, where ##g \in SO(3)## and ##A \in \mathbb R^{3\times 3}##. This representation is reducible to the representation on matrices proportional to the unit matrix, the representation on anti-symmetric matrices, and the representation on traceless symmetric matrices. How do we know that these representations are irreducible.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TroyElliott
  • #5
The same way you show that any irrep is irreducible. Show that there are no invariant subspaces.
The book that I am following, "Group Theory in a Nutshell", basically says since a rank-two tensor can be decomposed into a direct sum of 1, 3, and 5 dimensional representations, we will call them irreducible. Could you suggest a way to prove that the 3 and 5 dimensional anti-symmetric and symmetric-traceless tensors cannot be further reduced with a change of basis?

In general, given some tensor, I am not really sure how to show that it has no invariant subspaces under some transformation.
 
  • #6
samalkhaiat
Science Advisor
Insights Author
1,693
937
In general, given some tensor, I am not really sure how to show that it has no invariant subspaces under some transformation.
Split the tensor [itex]T[/itex] into symmetric [itex]S[/itex] and anti-symmetric [itex]A[/itex] parts, then show that [itex]S[/itex] and [itex]A[/itex] do not mix under the transformations of the group in question, i.e., they belong to different invariant subspaces. For example, under [itex]SO(3)[/itex] transformations [itex]R_{i}{}^{j}[/itex], you can easily show that [tex]S_{ij} \to \bar{S}_{ij} = R_{i}{}^{l}R_{j}{}^{k} \ S_{lk} ,[/tex][tex]A_{ij} \to \bar{A}_{ij} = R_{i}{}^{l}R_{j}{}^{k} \ A_{lk} .[/tex] And if you try the transformation [tex]S_{ij} \to \bar{A}_{ij} = M_{i}{}^{l}M_{j}{}^{k} \ S_{lk} ,[/tex] you can show that there exists no such matrix [itex]M[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

Related Threads on Question about the irreducible representation of a rank 2 tensor under SO(3)

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
670
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top