How Do SU(3) Tensors Decompose into Irreducible Components?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PineApple2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Su(3) Tensors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The decomposition of the tensor component ##T^a_b##, where the upper index is the ##\bf{3}## component and the lower index is the ##\bf{\bar{3}}## component, is established as ##\bf{3}\otimes\bf{\bar{3}}=\bf{8}\oplus\bf{1}##. The irreducibility of the transformations of the tensors ##\left( u^iv_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right)## and ##\left(\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right)## can be verified by contracting with invariant tensors such as ##\delta^i_j## and ##\epsilon^{ijk}##. The discussion also introduces Young Tableaux as a more elegant method for these computations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(3) group theory
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations
  • Knowledge of invariant tensors, specifically ##\delta^i_j## and ##\epsilon^{ijk}##
  • Basic concepts of irreducible representations in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Young Tableaux in representation theory
  • Explore the properties of SU(3) and its irreducible representations
  • Learn about the contraction of tensors and its implications in group theory
  • Investigate the determinant condition on SU(n) groups and its effects on tensor decomposition
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in group theory, and students studying quantum mechanics or particle physics, particularly those focusing on tensor analysis and representation theory.

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Suppose that in the tensor component ##T^a_b ## the upper index is the ## \bf{3}## component and the lower index is the ##\bf{\bar{3}} ## component. To be concrete, consider the decomposition
<br /> u^iv_j= \left( u^iv_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right) +\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k<br />
which corresponds to
<br /> \bf{3}\otimes\bf{\bar{3}}=\bf{8}\oplus\bf{1}<br />
I want to see that indeed the transformation of ##u^iv_j ## is reducible, but the transformations of ## \left( u^iv_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right)## and ##\left(\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right) ## are irreducible. My thought was to contract each of the supposedly irreducible tensors with the only possible invariant tensors, namely ##\delta^i_j ##, ##\epsilon^{ijk} ##, ##\epsilon_{ijk} ##, and to see that in each case I get zero, which means there are no invariant subspaces. So, taking ## \left( u^iv_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right)##
<br /> \delta^j_i \left( u^iv_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^i_j u^kv_k \right) = u^iv_i - \frac{1}{3}\delta^i_i u^kv_k =0<br />
is that a correct way to check irreducibility? and if so, how do I check this for ##\epsilon^{ijk} ## and ##\epsilon_{ijk} ##?
 
Hi - yes you are along the right lines. Just remember that anything contracted over all the indices of epsilon will be a singlet because of the determinant condition on SU(n) groups... and that all tensors can be decomposed into a symmetric and an antisymmetric part...(without giving away the answer oops).

However there is another way of doing these types of computation that is much more elegant - have you looked into Young Tableaux?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K