I am reading "Introductory Algebraic Number Theory"by Saban Alaca and Kenneth S. Williams ... and am currently focused on Chapter 1: Integral Domains ...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I need some help with understanding Example 1.4.1 ...

Example 1.4.1 reads as follows:

In the above text by Alaca and Williams we read the following:

"... ... From the first of these, as ##2## is irreducible in ##\mathbb{Z} + \mathbb{Z} \sqrt{ -5 }##, it must be the case that ##\alpha \sim 1## or ##\alpha \sim 2##. ... ...

My question is as follows ... how does ##2## being irreducible imply that ##\alpha \sim 1## or ##\alpha \sim 2##. ... ...?

Hope someone can help ...

Peter

================================================================================

NOTE

The notation ##\alpha \sim 1## is Alaca and Williams notation for ##\alpha## and ##1## being associates ...

Alaca's and Williams' definition of and properties of associates in an integral domain are as follows:

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Irreducibles and Primes in Integral Domains ...

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Irreducibles Primes Integral | Date |
---|---|

I Quadratic Polynomials and Irreducibles and Primes ... | Apr 2, 2017 |

I Definition of an irreducible element in an integral domain | Feb 18, 2017 |

Completeness and orthogonality of unitary irreducible representations | Feb 15, 2016 |

Prove irreducible (p-1)x^p-2 + (p-2)x^(p - 2)x^(p-3) + + 3x^2 + 2x + 1 p=prime | Jul 27, 2010 |

Why the prime/irreducible distinction? | Jan 14, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**