Is 0.5% Efficiency for a Steam Ejector Reasonable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ADunn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Pump
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency of a steam ejector calculated as a pump, yielding a result of 0.5%. The formula used for this calculation involves mass flow rate and pressure differentials, but one participant suggests that the formula may not be appropriate. A reference to the paper "An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment" is provided as a resource for better understanding ejector performance. The conversation highlights the need for accurate pressure and flow ratio measurements to evaluate ejector efficiency effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam ejector mechanics
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics principles
  • Knowledge of efficiency calculation formulas
  • Access to relevant engineering literature, such as the mentioned paper
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the paper "An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment"
  • Study the principles of fluid dynamics related to ejector performance
  • Investigate alternative formulas for calculating ejector efficiency
  • Explore pressure and flow ratio measurements in steam ejector applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and students interested in steam ejector design and efficiency analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ADunn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Efficiency of Ejector "as pump"

I was asked to find the efficiency of a steam ejector experiment "as a pump". So I tried the formula :

[(m(P/density + V^2/2))discharge - (m(P/density + V^2/2))suction]/
(m(P/density + V^2/2))steam inlet.

I am getting an efficiency of 0.5%.

Is this a reasonable result or am I approaching this wrong?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Hi, I am interested in these pumps but I have no idea what kind of pressure/flow ratios they can get. Can you please tell me for what measured values you got for 0.5% efficiency?

Thanks,
cezar
 


I don't think your formula is suitable,you can read the paper 《An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment》,which can be down load from http://ejector.getbbs.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
922
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K