Is 0 < B < A Given 0 < A < 1 and B = 1 - √(1-A)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kidmode01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between two real numbers A and B, specifically examining the conditions under which 0 < B < A given that 0 < A < 1 and B = 1 - √(1-A). Participants explore various proof strategies, including direct proofs and proof by contradiction, while addressing the validity of different approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to prove that 0 < B < A by negating the statement and arriving at a contradiction, but expresses difficulty in the proof process.
  • Another participant challenges the initial proof attempt, suggesting that the negation was incorrect and providing a hint to prove that 1 - √(1 - A) < A instead.
  • A different participant offers a proof that includes complex numbers, arguing that the proof holds for real numbers as well, though the reasoning is questioned by others.
  • One participant provides a detailed algebraic manipulation to show that B < A, while also indicating the need to prove that 0 < B.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the validity of proving the statement in complex space and its implications for real numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the various proof strategies. There are competing views on the correctness of the initial proof attempt and the relevance of complex numbers in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some proofs rely on specific assumptions about the nature of A and B, and the discussion includes various mathematical manipulations that may not be universally accepted or understood by all participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying inequalities in mathematics, particularly in the context of real and complex numbers, as well as individuals looking for different proof techniques in mathematical reasoning.

kidmode01
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Suppose A and B are real numbers
If [tex]0 < A < 1[/tex] and [tex]B = 1 - \sqrt{1-A}[/tex] then [tex]0 < B < A[/tex]

I tried proving this by assuming the "If" and then manipulating it to no avail.
I then tried proving it by contradiction and I was hoping someone could check my work.

First I negate the question so it is now(If A then B becomes: A and not B):

[tex]0 < A < 1[/tex] and [tex]B = 1 - \sqrt{1-A}[/tex] and [tex]A < B < 0[/tex]

Then:

[tex]A < 1 - \sqrt{1-A} < 0[/tex]

Looking at the right inequality:

[tex]1 - \sqrt{1-A} < 0[/tex]
[tex]1 < \sqrt{1-A}[/tex]
[tex]1 < 1 - A[/tex]
[tex]0 < -A[/tex]
[tex]0 > A[/tex]

But [tex]0 < A < 1[/tex], so that is a contradiction and so by theorem 0 < B < A.

I'm not very good at writing proofs down so if anyone has any tips for me or advice on what I can improve on that would be nice. Also I've never used this site before, so if anyone could give me advice on the etiquette of my first post that would be nice. Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi kidmode01! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :smile:)

Sorry, but you started completely wrong …

since A and B have to be positive, the negation is 0 < A < B …

you can't suppose A < 0.

Hint: You have to prove that 1 - √(1 - A) < A.

Start again, rewriting it as 1 - A < √(1 - A) :wink:
 
Hi :smile:

You started correctly only you have to finished it.
[tex]0 < B < A[/tex] for [tex]B=1-\sqrt{1-A}[/tex]. You can proof for [tex]A\in C(\re)[/tex].
[tex]0 < 1-\sqrt{1-A} < A[/tex]
First: [tex]0 <1-\sqrt{1-A}[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt{1-A} < 1 \;\; /^2[/tex]
[tex]1-A < |1|^{2}[/tex]
[tex]1-|1|^{2} < A[/tex]
[tex]1-1 < A[/tex]
[tex]0 < A[/tex]

and second:
[tex]1-\sqrt{1-A} < A[/tex]
[tex]1-A < \sqrt{1-A}\;\; /^2[/tex]
[tex]|1-A|^{2} < 1 - A[/tex]
and if [tex]A \in C[/tex]
[tex]|1-A|^{2}=(1-A)(1-\overline{A}) = 1 - \overline{A} - A + A\overline{A}[/tex]
[tex]1 - \overline{A} - A + A\overline{A} < 1 - A[/tex]
[tex]A\overline{A} - \overline{A} < 0[/tex]
[tex]A\overline{A} < \overline{A}[/tex]
[tex]A < 1[/tex]

This shows: [tex]0 < A < 1[/tex].
This proof shows that A can be defined in complex space and will have same define area as in real.
I think this is all you want if not send me email. I hope I helped you.

With respect
MrSnoopy
 
Sorry for bad writing - some problems with Physics server.
 
I was wondering if someone could further Mr Snoopy's explanation on why his proof is valid. I don't understand why proving it for A as an element of the complex numbers proves it for A as an element of the real numbers.

Thank you,
kidmode01
 
Since 0 < A < 1 then we have:

A < SqRoot(A)
A^2 < A
A^2 - A < 0

Adding 1 to both sides and rearranging the terms:

1 - A + A^2 < 1

Subtracting A from both sides:

1 - 2A + A^2 < 1 - A
(1 - A)^2 < 1 - A

Taking the square root of both sides:

1 - A < SqRoot(1-A)

1 < SqRoot(1-A) + A
1 - SqRoot(1-A) < A

And of course since B = 1 - SqRoot(1-A) then:

B < A

What's left to prove now is that 0 < B. Use the fact that 0 < A < 1
And so 0 < 1 - A < 1 Which means that 0 < SqRoot(1 - A) < 1
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your post JG89 but I know how to prove it for real numbers. I'm questioning Mr Snoopy's thought process on proving it in complex space.
 
kidmode01 said:
Suppose A and B are real numbers
If [tex]0 < A < 1[/tex] and [tex]B = 1 - \sqrt{1-A}[/tex] then [tex]0 < B < A[/tex]

I tried proving this by assuming the "If" and then manipulating it to no avail.
I then tried proving it by contradiction and I was hoping someone could check my work.

First I negate the question so it is now(If A then B becomes: A and not B):

Before negating, let's look at the statement logically..
Decompose the compound statement into simple ones..
p: 0<B<A <==>(0<B) AND (B<A)
The equivalence of both the statements can be easily verified...

By De Morgan's Rule, [tex]p^{c}[/tex] is [tex](0<B)^{c}[/tex] OR [tex](B<A)^{c}[/tex]..
So the negation would look like: (B<0) OR (A<B) where we are using the inclusive OR...

Now about the solution to the problem.. we can directly do it..

Substitute [tex]A=sin^{2} \theta=4 \cdot \sin^{2} \frac{\theta}{2} \cdot \cos^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}[/tex] where [tex]\theta \in (0,\frac{\pi}{2})[/tex]...

So [tex]B=1-\cos \theta=2 \cdot \sin^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}[/tex]

Obviously B>0.

B<A
[tex]\Leftrightarrow 2 \cdot \sin^{2} \frac{\theta}{2} < 4 \cdot \sin^{2} \frac{\theta}{2} \cdot \cos^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}[/tex]
[tex]\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} < \cos \frac{\theta}{2}[/tex]
which is obviously true as [tex]\frac{\theta}{2} \in (0, \frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]
Working backwards we get our desired result...
So 0<B<A
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K