Is 1 Really Equal to 0? An Amazing Discovery!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Office_Shredder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the provocative claim that 1 equals 0, exploring the implications and definitions that might support such a statement. Participants engage with mathematical concepts, definitions, and humor, while questioning the validity of the claim and its implications for established mathematical principles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have proven that 1 equals 0, prompting curiosity from others about the details of the proof.
  • Several participants express skepticism and request clarification on the proof, indicating a desire for more rigorous mathematical reasoning.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the concept of zero factorial, with some participants suggesting that it may relate to the claim.
  • Another participant references the Bohr-Mollerup Theorem and the gamma function, suggesting it could provide a mathematical framework for discussing factorials and their properties.
  • One participant expresses disappointment at the possibility of an inconsistency in mathematics being discovered, indicating a concern for the implications of the claim.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the claim that 1 equals 0. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain, with some engaging in light-hearted banter while others seek serious mathematical clarification.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to definitions and mathematical concepts that may not be universally accepted or understood, highlighting the potential for misinterpretation and the need for careful reasoning.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring mathematical definitions, factorials, and the philosophical implications of mathematical claims.

Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,706
Reaction score
1,592
Earlier today, I proved 1=0!


Think about it... it kind of tickles the brain in a weird way
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you going to post how you did it? I'd like to see.
 
quasar987 said:
Are you going to post how you did it? I'd like to see.

The irony is about waist-high in this thread.

- Warren
 
Yes, but can you prove that 2 + 2 [itex]\neq[/itex] 4!
 
chroot,

I can't see it. o_O
 
quasar987 said:
Are you going to post how you did it? I'd like to see.

I used a well-known, yet under-appreciated, definition.

mattmns, I'm working on it, but it may take a while.

But I have shown 2=2!
 
I meant, are you going to post the details of the proof.
 
Zero factorial?
 
1=0! by definition.

Office_Shredder said:
But I have shown 2=2!

2=2! by definition too.

Like Mickey said, are you saying 'zero factorial' or are you screaming 'ZERO' at the top of your lungs?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The Bohr-Mollerup Theorem could be used to show that the gamma function is the unique analytic continuation of the factorial to the complex plane less the non-positive integers that is log-convex and assumes real values for real arguments... and show that [tex]\Gamma (1) = 0! =1[/tex], but that might be kinda lame...
 
  • #11
Mickey said:
Zero factorial?

We have a winner! (<--- that's an exclamation mark, not a factorial).
 
  • #12
It had been possible that an inconsistency in mathematics was discovered. How disappointing.
 
  • #13
Yay. Bring on the cute math babes. o:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K