Is a 2004 Discovery About Physics Still Relevant Today?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LostInSpaceTime
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of the 2004 Variable Speed of Light (VSL) theories in contemporary physics. Participants highlight that while these theories occasionally gain attention, they are often refuted by prominent physicists such as Michael Duff and John Barrow. The consensus is that the laws of physics remain invariant regardless of measurement units, emphasizing that the speed of light is fundamentally tied to Planck units. The implications of any perceived changes in the speed of light should be examined through the lens of dimensionless ratios rather than conventional measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Variable Speed of Light (VSL) theories
  • Familiarity with Planck units and their significance in physics
  • Knowledge of the works of physicists like Michael Duff and John Barrow
  • Basic grasp of dimensional analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Variable Speed of Light theories on modern physics
  • Study the significance of Planck units in theoretical physics
  • Examine critiques of VSL theories by Michael Duff and John Barrow
  • Explore dimensional analysis and its applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of changing constants in the universe.

LostInSpaceTime
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I just stumbled upon this and I was wondering of it's validity.I would have thought if this was true it would have been out in the mainstream even more. It's from 2004 but i would think still relevant. I would like to hear some more about this from u guys...like, is this for real?...this seems to be one of those changes in physics that would screw up some stuff, no? What would the repercussions be if it happened again.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LostInSpaceTime said:
I just stumbled upon this and I was wondering of it's validity.I would have thought if this was true it would have been out in the mainstream even more. It's from 2004 but i would think still relevant. I would like to hear some more about this from u guys...like, is this for real?...this seems to be one of those changes in physics that would screw up some stuff, no? What would the repercussions be if it happened again.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html

these Variable Speed of Light (VSL) theories spring up periodically. then they get some attention in the popular press. then they get refuted by the likes of Michael Duff
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093 and http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0110060
or John Barrow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units#Planck_units_and_the_invariant_scaling_of_nature
point out what the problem is.

i guess what i think I've said before:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1357747&postcount=14
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1399479&postcount=32

the laws of physics doesn't give a rat's ass about what units we use to measure things. the speed of light is necessarily always 1 Planck length per Planck time and if we think that the speed of light (in units we like to use) has changed, the more salient observation iis whether the number of Planck lengths per meter has changed or if the number of Planck times per second has changed, or both (these ratios are dimensionless numbers) and, if that is the case (making us think the speed of E&M propagation has changed, we should be noting the change in one of these dimensionless values and ask why that.
 
Ok Thanks...I was just wondering. Because like you mentioned every once and a while you hear about it but i never asked until now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K