Is a Career in Civil Engineering Conducive to Research Opportunities?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for research opportunities within a civil engineering career, particularly in relation to environmental interests and the balance between practical work and scientific inquiry. Participants explore the implications of choosing civil engineering as a major, especially in the context of pursuing research versus project management roles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to engage in research related to fluid flow and flood mitigation, questioning the feasibility of this within a civil engineering career.
  • Another participant suggests that civil engineering often leads to project management roles, with limited research opportunities unless one pursues a PhD.
  • A third participant shares anecdotal experiences from a retired civil engineer, indicating that much of civil engineering practice is focused on established technologies and project management rather than innovative research.
  • Some participants note that while there are interesting developments in civil engineering, such as "green" concrete, significant research roles typically require advanced degrees.
  • Concerns are raised about the monotony of project management tasks, such as filling out Gantt charts, and whether civil engineering offers sufficient intellectual challenge.
  • One participant mentions that research roles are predominantly filled by PhD holders, with BS and MS engineers often supporting research efforts rather than leading them.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of finding a field that is interesting and fulfilling, suggesting that civil engineering could be a good fit despite the potential limitations in research opportunities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that research opportunities in civil engineering are limited and often require a PhD, but there is no consensus on whether this limitation is unique to civil engineering or applicable to engineering fields in general. The discussion reflects a mix of perspectives on the balance between practical work and research in civil engineering.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying degrees of concern about the focus of civil engineering on project management versus research, and there are differing opinions on the intellectual challenges associated with the field. The discussion highlights the importance of individual interests and career goals in making educational choices.

person123
Messages
326
Reaction score
52
Hello all. I'm going off to college this summer (yah!), and I'm planning on majoring in civil. I'm interested in the environment (I was considering environmental engineering for a while), but I also love physics and I thought civil would be a good combination. However, it seems like a career in civil would be less focused on the sciences than other fields (like mechanical), and more focused on the corporate world -- I really don't want something like this:

Ideally, I want to get into research, like say analyzing fluid flow around the shore and figuring out what kinds of structures would mitigate the effect of floods (just an example). I want to learn new concepts in science into my career. How possible would it be to do stuff like that going into civil?

(I'm going to Stony Brook, by the way, and since it is big on research, that might make a difference).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
person123 said:
I really don't want something like this:
Unfortunately I don't think there's much running away from situations like that, regardless of your field. And sometimes it gets even worse the more "experts" you have in the room.
 
My father (now retired) was a Civil Engineer who designed wastewater treatment plants and did flood mitigation and simulation. He used to joke around that most of the technology he used was invented during the Roman Empire (he was exaggerating, of course) and he would tell me to be a Civil Engineer you only need to know two things: 1. Water flows downhill (except uphill towards money), and 2. You can't push a rope.

He's a funny guy.

A lot of Civil Engineer is focused on practice, large public work projects and a lot of project management type stuff. There are some very interesting developments in Civil Engineering research (e.g. "green" concrete, using wetlands for wasterwater treatment, etc.) but unless you get a PhD and go into research you'll probably end up doing project management and filling out Gantt Charts (like my Dad did). In all honest me hearing about his work over the years pushed me to Electrical Engineering.
 
The Civil field is quite varied...environmental, structural, transportation, geology, green design, etc...not much for research unless you go for a PhD...mechanical engineering might be a better choice for fluid flow courses...I am a civil structural and enjoy it..i'm not a research guy.. I focus on the basics and apply it in all sorts of ways...maybe not for you, though. Civil is probably the easiest of the major engineering disciplines, and pay scales are a bit below the others.
 
Thanks for the advice.

Do you know if in general research is only really available for engineers after getting a PhD, or is this something particularly true for civil engineers?

It is quite a long way in the future, so I think I'm going to make my decision for major mainly based on what's offered at my college, in which case I'm pretty set on civil (the courses seem more interesting). Later in life, research would be nice, but I guess what I really want is something which challenges me and isn't too monotonous (the gantt charts do seem kind of dull). I really don't care about pay.
 
person123 said:
Do you know if in general research is only really available for engineers after getting a PhD, or is this something particularly true for civil engineers?

For the most part, yeah, research is *mostly* limited to PhD engineers. This is for the practical reason is that you spend years getting trained to perform research during your PhD studies so the company can just take advantage of this without paying to train someone.

I do research for a bit more that 50% of my time and I can tell you in my organization most of the other researchers have PhDs (not all, but most). There are plenty of BS and MS engineers here but they mostly support the research staff. For example, they would design boards and test stands, supervise students to carry out testing and so on. Still very interesting work but to move the state of the art in research you need to have a deep command of a narrow field, and you learn how to acquire that while you earn you PhD.

You'll be far happier doing something you find interesting, so studying Civil sounds like a great plan. There are some interesting design jobs out there, but beware of working for a county or city government (or utility) because you often become a project manager for the consultants hired to do the actual work. The trade off there is you have a secure job and the consultants are always scrambling for their next project.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: person123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K