Is a Circle Considered a Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Function
Click For Summary
A circle is not considered a function in Cartesian coordinates because it fails the vertical line test, which states that a function can only have one output (y-value) for each input (x-value). While a circle itself is a set of points and does not represent a function, portions of it, such as arcs, can be functions. In polar or parametric coordinate systems, circles can be represented as functions, demonstrating that the context of the coordinate system is crucial. The discussion highlights a common misconception that graphs and functions are synonymous, emphasizing the need for clarity in mathematical definitions. Ultimately, understanding the distinction between geometric shapes and their functional representations is essential in mathematics.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
I was brought up believing that when a mapping had more than one ordinate (y) for a particular abscissa (x), it did not describe a function. So is a circle not a function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
correct.....
 
The so-called "vertical test" will always tell u the answer.In the case of the circle,there are an infinite number of portions/arches (is this the word?? :confused: ) which are functions.

Daniel.
 
<pointing out what a function is> A function from where to where?
 
There is some semantics involved.
Since a circle is a geometrical figure, the wording: 'is a circle a function' has no meaning.
For the same reason, a parabola is not a function, but the graph of the function is.

...doh, I `m getting old and picky. Nevermind... :redface:
 
Indeed, even if we interpret "is a parabola a function" to mean "is a relation whose graph is a parabola a function" we would have to specify the coordinate system. A parabola whose axis is parallel to the y-axis corresponds to a function but exactly the same parabola, in a rotated coordinate system would not be.

(Notice I switched from "circle" to "parabola". A circle, in any coordinate system, does not correspond to a function.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
A circle, in any coordinate system, does not correspond to a function.
In any carthesian coordinate system.
In a polar coordinate system, it does.
 
I mathematics, a function is a sort of black box - you put something in, and it spits something out. (There are other ways to think of them as well.) Now, you ask whether a circle is a function, and the answer is clearly no, since a circle is typically a set of points.

In the familiar (I suppose it could be called cartesian) system, there is no function that whose plot is a circle. In a polar or parametric system functions can readily have circular plots.

It is also relatively easy to see that:
f(x)=\sqrt{1-x}
generates the plot of a half circle - which can often be used instead.
 
NateTG said:
f(x)=\sqrt{1-x}
generates the plot of a half circle - which can often be used instead.
That is: f(x)=\sqrt{1-x^2}
 
  • #10
The plot of
f:[0,2\pi) \to \mathbb{R}^2
f(x)=(cos(x),sin(x))

is a circle.
Or is this cheating?
 
  • #11
This is the "non-cartesian function" people were mentioning. The question, from what i can tell, boils down to the fact that the OP thinks a graph and a function are the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K