Is a Constant Function Always Riemann Integrable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michonamona
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Riemann integrability of a constant function defined on a closed interval [a, b]. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that such a function is integrable and determining the value of the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers whether to use first principles or definitions to approach the problem. They propose that since the function is constant, the upper and lower sums would be equal, suggesting Riemann integrability. Other participants question the sufficiency of this reasoning and emphasize the need to explicitly show the integral's value.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to reference definitions and clarify the proof of the integral's value. There appears to be a productive dialogue, with multiple interpretations of the problem being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of Riemann integrability and the implications of a constant function within the context of the problem. The original poster is navigating the requirements of their homework assignment, which may impose specific methods or definitions to be used.

michonamona
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that f(x)=c for all x in [a,b]. Show that f is integrable and that [tex]\int ^{a}_{b}[/tex]f(x)dx = c(b-a)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand all the definitions for Integration, my problem lies with approaching the problem. Should I use first principles to solve the problem? or do I just need to quote the definition?

For example, can I say "since f(x) is constant then it must be the case that upper sums equal its lower sums. Which implies that its upper integral equals its lower integral. Therefore f is Riemann integrable. Such that [tex]\int ^{a}_{b}[/tex]f(x)dx = c(b-a)

Is this sufficient?

Thank you for your help.

M
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should quote the definition from Riemann Integrability, and then explicitely substitute the information from your question into the definition. Your statement, even if it was sufficient to your professor to show f is intebrable, does nothing to show that the actual value of the integral is c(b-a).
 
Thank you for your reply.

So my attempted solution is correct? All I need to do now is to prove that it is indeed c(b-a)?

So since c is a constant, it follows that c=M=m, where M and m are the max and min of each interval in the partion P[tex]\epsilon[/tex][a,b]. This therefore implies that we do not need any partitions in [a,b] since its a straight line. U(f,P) = L(f,P) therefore c(b-a).

Thanks,

M
 
No it is not. If you follow what I said in the last post, you will answer both parts of the question.
 
All right, thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K