Is a Flexible Drive Shaft Suitable for 90° Motion Transmission?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A flexible drive shaft is a viable option for transmitting motion at a 90° angle in applications requiring low torque and low RPM, such as a multiple rails positioning system for lasers. Unlike worm or bevel gears, a flexible drive shaft eliminates backlash issues and can be more cost-effective. However, efficiency concerns must be addressed, as flexible drive shafts may not transmit motion as effectively as geared solutions. Historical mechanisms, such as lineshaft systems, demonstrate alternative methods for achieving similar motion transfer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of flexible drive shafts and their applications
  • Knowledge of motion transmission mechanisms, including worm gears and bevel gears
  • Familiarity with torque and RPM concepts in mechanical systems
  • Basic principles of mechanical efficiency and backlash in gear systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and application of flexible drive shafts in motion transmission
  • Explore the efficiency comparisons between flexible drive shafts and traditional gear systems
  • Investigate historical lineshaft systems and their mechanical principles
  • Learn about backlash reduction techniques in mechanical design
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, product designers, and hobbyists interested in motion transmission solutions and the application of flexible drive shafts in precision systems.

nitai108
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need to transmit motion at a 90° angle, I was considering worm gears or bevelled gears, but then I thought about a flexible drive shaft, it would be cheaper and wouldn't have any backslash issues. I need to transmit motion at a 90° angle with a low toque and low RPM, the application is a simple and precise multiple rails positioning system for a few lasers.
Do you think I could use a flexible drive shaft for my application? Would it be harder to turn, compared to a geared solution? Would I have any disadvantages?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think those things do not transmit motion with good efficiency.
InputMotion ≠ OutputMotion.
 
I once saw a 90* motion transfer mechanism that had been used in lineshaft systems. It's input shaft drove a reciprocating arm via a ball joint which, in turn, caused a central shaft to oscillate. This oscillating motion was imparted to a second reciprocating arm which drove the output shaft. The neat thing about it, I thought, was that both shafts turned in the same direction. The mechanism was enclosed in a cast iron box and ran in oil. of course, lineshafts went out of style a century ago, but some sharp engineers worked on them and invented some pretty inpressive technology. I don't know where you'd find info or pix of this; nobody anymore is much interested in outdated technology except oddballs like me!

Rick A
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K