Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the necessity of obtaining a Master's degree in Civil Engineering for pursuing a career in California, particularly in light of current economic conditions and job market predictions. Participants explore the implications of educational qualifications on employment opportunities and licensing requirements.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions whether pursuing a Master's degree is worthwhile given the current economy and considers looking for a job after completing their undergraduate degree.
- Another participant shares uncertainty about the job market and references statistics suggesting that unemployment may not return to pre-recession levels until 2014, though they acknowledge the limitations of this data.
- A participant advocates for pursuing a Master's degree, suggesting it is beneficial, especially for those looking to change areas within civil engineering.
- There is a query about changes to prerequisites for the Professional Engineer (P.E.) exam, with rumors suggesting that a Master's degree or 30 graduate credit hours may be required, which could influence decisions regarding further education.
- Another participant mentions that after 2011, a Master's degree may be necessary to work for the state in California, indicating a potential shift in job requirements.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions on the necessity of a Master's degree, with some advocating for it while others remain uncertain. There is no consensus on the impact of economic conditions or licensing changes on this decision.
Contextual Notes
The discussion includes references to economic predictions and potential changes in licensing requirements, but these points are not fully substantiated and depend on evolving circumstances.