Is a Matrix Also Considered a Vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter judahs_lion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether matrices can be considered vectors, clarifying that while matrices are not typically viewed as vectors in standard coordinate form, they can be classified as vectors within a vector space framework. Participants explore the relationship between matrices and vectors, noting a bijection between n x m matrices and vectors in Rnm. The conversation shifts to determining linear independence among vectors v1, v2, and v3, with emphasis on using the standard definition of linear independence. It is concluded that v3 is dependent on v1 and v2, confirming their linear dependence. The discussion effectively highlights the nuances of vector and matrix relationships in linear algebra.
judahs_lion
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
This question makes no since to me are these matrixes v1, v2 ,v3 actually vectors as stated in the problem attached?
 

Attachments

  • takehomeexam10.jpg
    takehomeexam10.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 432
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not vectors in the form that you usually encounter them (i.e. as a string of coordinates in n-dimensional space).
However, if you call any element of a vector space (that is, a set that satisfies certain axioms) a vector, then indeed they are.

Note by the way that there is always a bijection between n x m matrices and vectors in Rnm.
 
How would I go about finding the determinate of them or would I have to go about another method to test for independence? I can tell the vector {4,4;4,4} would not be in the span because there is no multiple of d for({a, b;c,d} that would ever equal 4 because d is always 0.
 
You don't need the determinant to solve this problem. You are just looking for some a, b such that a\,\mathbf v_1 + b\,\mathbf v_2 = \mathbf v_3 -- or show that no such a, b exist.
 
D H said:
You don't need the determinant to solve this problem. You are just looking for some a, b such that a\,\mathbf v_1 + b\,\mathbf v_2 = \mathbf v_3 -- or show that no such a, b exist.

Thanks so a = -7, b =1;

Span(v1,v2,v3) = {<a, -a; c , 0> : a, c belong to R} ?
 
judahs_lion said:
Thanks so a = -7, b =1;
Nope. Edit: Oops, my bad. I checked it again after seeing DH's post, and I'm the one who messed up.

I suggest you use the standard definition of linear independence. \{v_1,\dots,v_k\} is linearly independent if

\sum a_i v_i=0\Rightarrow a_i=0 \text{ for all }i

(What DH said works too).
 
Last edited:
judahs_lion said:
Thanks so a = -7, b =1;
Good. So what does that mean in terms of the problem? (You need to determine whether v1, v2, v3 are dependent or independent.)

Span(v1,v2,v3) = {<a, -a; c , 0> : a, c belong to R} ?
That looks good.
 
D H said:
Good. So what does that mean in terms of the problem? (You need to determine whether v1, v2, v3 are dependent or independent.)


That looks good.

That means they are dependent? v3 depends on v1 and v2
 
Correct.
 
  • #10
D H said:
Correct.

Thank you
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K