Is a New Exact Solution to Einstein's Equations Possible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential for a new exact solution to Einstein's gravitational field equations, as proposed by Dr. Franklin Felber. Participants explore the implications of this solution, particularly in relation to concepts like antigravity and its feasibility for space travel at relativistic speeds. The conversation touches on theoretical physics, the validity of the claims made, and the credibility of the sources involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the term "exact solution" in physics, questioning whether such a concept can truly exist.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the use of the term "antigravity," with some suggesting it is more commonly associated with fringe theories rather than established physics.
  • One participant references various known exact solutions to general relativity, such as the Schwarzschild solution, and discusses their relevance to the claims made by Felber.
  • Another participant mentions that Felber's work may involve gravitational repulsion at relativistic speeds, which they find intriguing but also potentially problematic.
  • There is a suggestion that Felber's findings may simply be a rediscovery of known concepts, such as centrifugal force, rather than a groundbreaking new theory.
  • Some participants express a lack of familiarity with Felber's work and the Advanced Institute at Austin, indicating a need for further investigation into the credibility of the claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the validity of Felber's claims, with multiple competing views on the nature and implications of his proposed solution. The discussion remains unresolved, with skepticism and curiosity coexisting.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note a lack of familiarity with the specifics of Felber's work, which may limit their ability to fully assess the claims being made. Additionally, the discussion reflects varying interpretations of terms like "exact solution" and "antigravity," which may depend on specific definitions and contexts.

Plastic Photon
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
http://www.physorg.com/news10789.html

New antigravity solution will enable space travel near speed of light by the end of this century, he predicts.
On Tuesday, Feb. 14, noted physicist Dr. Franklin Felber will present his new exact solution of Einstein's 90-year-old gravitational field equation to the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) in Albuquerque. The solution is the first that accounts for masses moving near the speed of light.


Does anybody know anything about this Dr. Febler or the Advanced Institute at Austin? I can't find a dime to spit on.

I have not taken any physics courses yet, but I do know what is meant by 'exact' (as stated in the title) form my math courses.

Can such a thing as 'exact solution' exist in physics? I am sure it was not Febler's choice for a title, though. I find the use of the term 'anit-gravity' a little bit...uhm, not scientific. Isn't 'anit-gravity' what crackpots and quaks use to highlight their work, not a physicists?

Well, I will say bunko on this one. Even though nothing has been presented as of yet and with my capacity I should not be commenting on such things as this, but I have seen so many other congruent cases.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Lorentzian, Schwarzschild, Einstein-Rosen (bridge), a "dust" universe and Robertson-Walker metrics are all examples of "exact" solutions to constraints upon general relativity. Even space void of matter and energy might qualify.

My recollection is that Hal Putoff of the Advanced Insitute in Austin studies the controversial "zero-point" energy there, among other speculations.
 
robphy said:


From the abstract of the first one:

The Schwarzschild solution is used to find the exact relativistic motion of a payload in the gravitational field of a mass moving with constant velocity. At radial approach or recession speeds faster than 3^-1/2 times the speed of light, even a small mass gravitationally repels a payload. At relativistic speeds, a suitable mass can quickly propel a heavy payload from rest nearly to the speed of light with negligible stresses on the payload.

Gravitational repulsion from the Schwartzschild metric?
 
He looks at an object with angular momentum round a gravitating body, and finds that there's a mysterious repulsive force if he changes the coordinate system. My guess is that he's rediscovered centrifugal force.
 
chronon said:
He looks at an object with angular momentum round a gravitating body, and finds that there's a mysterious repulsive force if he changes the coordinate system. My guess is that he's rediscovered centrifugal force.

:smile: :smile: :smile: Wow if that's true, (havent read it) i'd love to see him present this.

"As you can see this repulsive force must be antigravity"

"Ok, Dr...have you every spun a bucket of water over your head?"
 
More nonsense from the Hal Putoff Institute of nonsense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K