MHB Is a Prime Artinian Ring Simple?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Rings
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question that I am struggling find the answer. Any nudge in the correct direction would be greatly appreciated.

Question:

Prove that a prime Artinian ring is simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose $P$ is a (two-sided) prime ideal of our Artinian ring, $R$. Choose any $x \in R - P$.

Claim 1: $Rx^n + P$ is a left ideal of $R$ for any $n \in \Bbb Z^+$. To see this, suppose we have:

$a = rx^n + p$
$b = r'x^n + p'$ for $r,r' \in R, p,p' \in P$.

Then $a - b = rx^n + p - r'x^n - p = (r-r')x^n + (p - p') \in Rx^n + P$, so this is an additive subgroup.

Also, for any $r'' \in R$:

$r''a = r''(rx^n + p) = (r''r)x^n + r''p \in Rx^n + P$

Now we have the descending chain:

$Rx + P \supseteq Rx^2 + P \supseteq \cdots \supseteq Rx^n + P \supseteq Rx^{n+1} + P \supseteq \cdots$

and since $R$ is Artinian it is left-Artinian, so this stabilizes for some positive integer $n$.

Hence $x^n = rx^{n+1} + p$ for some $r \in R, p \in P$, which means that:

$x^n - rx^{n+1} = (1 - rx)x^n \in P$.

$x^n \in P \implies x \in P$ so we must have: $1 - rx \in P$, by our choice of $x$.

Hence, $1 = rx + (1 - rx) \in Rx + P$ which shows $P$ is a maximal left ideal.

A similar proof using $xR + P$ shows $P$ is a maximal right ideal as well.

Since our ring $R$ is also postulated to be prime, $\{0\}$ is a prime ideal of $R$, and thus (by the above) $\{0\}$ is a maximal ideal, that is: $R$ is simple.

********

(This proof is probably somewhat "inelegant", Artinian conditions aren't my strong suit).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top